» Articles » PMID: 38760664

Mapping the Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy Research Landscape: Topic Modeling of the Literature

Overview
Journal Global Spine J
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2024 May 17
PMID 38760664
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: Topic modeling of literature.

Objectives: Our study has 2 goals: (i) to clarify key themes in degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) research, and (ii) to evaluate the current trends in the popularity or decline of these topics. Additionally, we aim to highlight the potential of natural language processing (NLP) in facilitating research syntheses.

Methods: Documents were retrieved from Scopus, preprocessed, and modeled using BERTopic, an NLP-based topic modeling method. We specified a minimum topic size of 25 documents and 50 words per topic. After the models were trained, they generated a list of topics and corresponding representative documents. We utilized linear regression models to examine trends within the identified topics. In this context, topics exhibiting increasing linear slopes were categorized as "hot topics," while those with decreasing slopes were categorized as "cold topics".

Results: Our analysis retrieved 3510 documents that were classified into 21 different topics. The 3 most frequently occurring topics were "OPLL" (ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament), "Anterior Fusion," and "Surgical Outcomes." Trend analysis revealed the hottest topics of the decade to be "Animal Models," "DCM in the Elderly," and "Posterior Decompression" while "Morphometric Analyses," "Questionnaires," and "MEP and SSEP" were identified as being the coldest topics.

Conclusions: Our NLP methodology conducted a thorough and detailed analysis of DCM research, uncovering valuable insights into research trends that were otherwise difficult to discern using traditional techniques. The results provide valuable guidance for future research directions, policy considerations, and identification of emerging trends.

References
1.
Pham M, Rajic A, Greig J, Sargeant J, Papadopoulos A, McEwen S . A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Res Synth Methods. 2015; 5(4):371-85. PMC: 4491356. DOI: 10.1002/jrsm.1123. View

2.
Chen R, Liu J, Zhao Y, Diao Y, Chen X, Pan S . Predictive Value of Preoperative Short Form-36 Survey Scale for Postoperative Axial Neck Pain in Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy. Global Spine J. 2023; 15(2):540-547. PMC: 11877598. DOI: 10.1177/21925682231200136. View

3.
Malhotra A, He Y, Harrington E, Jaja B, Zhu M, Shakil H . Development of the cervical myelopathy severity index: a new patient reported outcome measure to quantify impairments and functional limitations. Spine J. 2023; 24(3):424-434. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.10.018. View

4.
Tian X, Zhao H, Han F, Rudd S, Li Z, Ding W . Treatment of three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy using ACDF or a combination of ACDF and ACCF. Front Surg. 2022; 9:1021643. PMC: 9523112. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1021643. View

5.
Borah R, Brown A, Capers P, Kaiser K . Analysis of the time and workers needed to conduct systematic reviews of medical interventions using data from the PROSPERO registry. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(2):e012545. PMC: 5337708. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012545. View