» Articles » PMID: 38751328

Significance of QRS Scoring System in Left Ventricular Function Recovery After Acute Myocardial Infarction

Overview
Journal ESC Heart Fail
Date 2024 May 16
PMID 38751328
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: The Selvester scoring system has been derived from ECG parameters for estimating infarct size. However, there is still a lack of evidence for Selvester score as an alternative to cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) myocardial injury makers for risk stratification and prediction of left ventricular function (LVF) recovery among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Methods And Results: This multicentre observational study enrolled 328 STEMI patients (88.4% men, 57.3 ± 10.6 years of age) undergoing CMR examination 1 week post-reperfusion therapy. Patients with baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% underwent a follow-up CMR 6 months later, categorized into baseline normal LVF (ejection fraction [EF] ≥ 50% at baseline, n = 155); recovered LVF (EF < 50% at baseline and ≥50% after 6 months, n = 69); and reduced LVF (EF < 50% at baseline and after 6 months, n = 104). The median follow-up was 4 (3-4) years for all patients, with 61 patients experiencing major adverse cardiovascular event (MACEs). Patients with reduced LVF had a higher risk of MACEs than those with baseline normal LVF (P = 0.01), while the recovered LVF group had no significant difference (P > 0.05). A Selvester score >10 doubled the risk of MACEs in patients with systolic dysfunction (1.91 [1.02 to 3.58], P = 0.04). Additionally, Selvester score, baseline LVEF, transmural infarction, and peak CK-MB were independent predictors of recovered LVF, with Selvester score providing incremental predictive value to peak CK-MB in predicting recovered LVF (∆AUC = 0.07, P < 0.05).

Conclusions: The Selvester score improves risk stratification among STEMI patients beyond LVEF and provide independent and incremental information to clinical parameters in predicting recovered LVF.

Citing Articles

Significance of QRS scoring system in left ventricular function recovery after acute myocardial infarction.

A X, Dan Q, Li M, Qian G, Shi Y, Chen Y ESC Heart Fail. 2024; 11(5):2778-2788.

PMID: 38751328 PMC: 11424305. DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.14795.

References
1.
Chew D, Heikki H, Schmidt G, Kavanagh K, Dommasch M, Thomsen P . Change in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Following First Myocardial Infarction and Outcome. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018; 4(5):672-682. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacep.2017.12.015. View

2.
Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes M, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H . 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European.... Eur Heart J. 2017; 39(2):119-177. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393. View

3.
A X, Dan Q, Li M, Qian G, Shi Y, Chen Y . Significance of QRS scoring system in left ventricular function recovery after acute myocardial infarction. ESC Heart Fail. 2024; 11(5):2778-2788. PMC: 11424305. DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.14795. View

4.
Brooks G, Lee B, Rao R, Lin F, Morin D, Zweibel S . Predicting Persistent Left Ventricular Dysfunction Following Myocardial Infarction: The PREDICTS Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016; 67(10):1186-1196. PMC: 4854198. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.12.042. View

5.
Ndrepepa G, Mehilli J, Martinoff S, Schwaiger M, Schomig A, Kastrati A . Evolution of left ventricular ejection fraction and its relationship to infarct size after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007; 50(2):149-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.03.034. View