» Articles » PMID: 38750187

The Killifish Germline Regulates Longevity and Somatic Repair in a Sex-specific Manner

Overview
Journal Nat Aging
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2024 May 15
PMID 38750187
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Classical evolutionary theories propose tradeoffs among reproduction, damage repair and lifespan. However, the specific role of the germline in shaping vertebrate aging remains largely unknown. In this study, we used the turquoise killifish (Nothobranchius furzeri) to genetically arrest germline development at discrete stages and examine how different modes of infertility impact life history. We first constructed a comprehensive single-cell gonadal atlas, providing cell-type-specific markers for downstream phenotypic analysis. We show here that germline depletion-but not arresting germline differentiation-enhances damage repair in female killifish. Conversely, germline-depleted males instead showed an extension in lifespan and rejuvenated metabolic functions. Through further transcriptomic analysis, we highlight enrichment of pro-longevity pathways and genes in germline-depleted male killifish and demonstrate functional conservation of how these factors may regulate longevity in germline-depleted Caenorhabditis elegans. Our results, therefore, demonstrate that different germline manipulation paradigms can yield pronounced sexually dimorphic phenotypes, implying alternative responses to classical evolutionary tradeoffs.

Citing Articles

Multi-tissue transcriptomic aging atlas reveals predictive aging biomarkers in the killifish.

Costa E, Chen J, Guldner I, Mboning L, Schmahl N, Tsenter A bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39975269 PMC: 11838286. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.28.635350.


The master male sex determinant Gdf6Y of the turquoise killifish arose through allelic neofunctionalization.

Richter A, Morl H, Thielemann M, Kleemann M, Geissen R, Schwarz R Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):540.

PMID: 39788971 PMC: 11718055. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-55899-7.


Emerging insights in senescence: pathways from preclinical models to therapeutic innovations.

Mansfield L, Ramponi V, Gupta K, Stevenson T, Mathew A, Barinda A NPJ Aging. 2024; 10(1):53.

PMID: 39578455 PMC: 11584693. DOI: 10.1038/s41514-024-00181-1.


Sex as a biological variable in ageing: insights and perspectives on the molecular and cellular hallmarks.

Fritz Garcia J, Keller Valsecchi C, Basilicata M Open Biol. 2024; 14(10):240177.

PMID: 39471841 PMC: 11521605. DOI: 10.1098/rsob.240177.


Sex-specific growth and lifespan effects of germline removal in the dioecious nematode Caenorhabditis remanei.

Lind M, Mautz B, Carlsson H, Hinas A, Gudmunds E, Maklakov A Aging Cell. 2024; 23(11):e14290.

PMID: 39082232 PMC: 11561660. DOI: 10.1111/acel.14290.

References
1.
de Magalhaes J, Costa J, Church G . An analysis of the relationship between metabolism, developmental schedules, and longevity using phylogenetic independent contrasts. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2007; 62(2):149-60. PMC: 2288695. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/62.2.149. View

2.
Austad S, Hoffman J . Is antagonistic pleiotropy ubiquitous in aging biology?. Evol Med Public Health. 2018; 2018(1):287-294. PMC: 6276058. DOI: 10.1093/emph/eoy033. View

3.
Kirkwood T . Evolution of ageing. Nature. 1977; 270(5635):301-4. DOI: 10.1038/270301a0. View

4.
Kirkwood T, Austad S . Why do we age?. Nature. 2000; 408(6809):233-8. DOI: 10.1038/35041682. View

5.
Schumacher B, Garinis G, Hoeijmakers J . Age to survive: DNA damage and aging. Trends Genet. 2008; 24(2):77-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2007.11.004. View