Effect of Post-vitrification Cryopreservation Duration on Singleton Birth-weight in Frozen-thawed Blastocysts Transfer Cycles

Overview

Journal Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)

Specialty Endocrinology

Date 2024 May 15

PMID 38745950

Authors

Xue Wang

Yaling Xiao

Zhengyi Sun

Wei Xiong

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to explore the effect of cryopreservation duration after blastocyst vitrification on the singleton birth-weight of newborns to assess the safety of long-term preservation of frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (FBT) cycles.

Methods: This was a retrospective observational study conducted at the Gynecological Endocrinology and Assisted Reproduction Center of the Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Patients who gave birth to singletons between January 2006 and December 2021 after undergoing FBT cycles were included. Five groups were formed according to the duration of cryopreservation of embryos at FBT: Group I included 274 patients with a storage time < 3 months. Group II included 607 patients with a storage time of 3-6 months. Group III included 322 patients with a storage time of 6-12 months. Group IV included 190 patients with a storage time of 12-24 months. Group V included 118 patients with a storage time of > 24 months. Neonatal outcomes were compared among the groups. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate birth-weights and other birth-related outcomes.

Results: A total of 1,511 patients were included in the analysis. The longest cryopreservation period was 12 years. The birth-weights of neonates in the five groups were 3344.1 ± 529.3, 3326.1 ± 565.7, 3260.3 ± 584.1, 3349.9 ± 582.7, and 3296.7 ± 491.9 g, respectively (P > 0.05). The incidences of preterm birth, very preterm birth, low birth-weight, and very low birth-weight were similar in all groups (P > 0.05). The large-for-gestational-age and small-for-gestational-age rates did not differ significantly among the groups (P > 0.05). After adjusting for confounding factors that may affect neonatal outcomes, a trend for an increased risk of low birth-weight with prolonged cryopreservation was observed. However, cryopreservation duration and neonatal birth-weight were not significantly correlated (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: The duration of cryopreservation after blastocyst vitrification with an open device for more than 2 years had no significant effect on the birth-weight of FBT singletons; however, attention should be paid to a possible increase in the risk of low birth-weight.

References

Glujovsky D, Farquhar C . Cleavage-stage or blastocyst transfer: what are the benefits and harms?. Fertil Steril. 2016; 106(2):244-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.06.029. View

Zheng Q, Mo M, Zhang H, Xu S, Xu F, Wang S . Prolong cryopreservation duration negatively affects pregnancy outcomes of vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers using an open-device system: A retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2022; 281:68-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.12.012. View

Zhu Q, Wang N, Wang B, Wang Y, Kuang Y . The risk of birth defects among children born after vitrified blastocyst transfers and those born after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage embryo transfers. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018; 298(4):833-840. DOI: 10.1007/s00404-018-4870-x. View

Edgar D, Gook D . A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos. Hum Reprod Update. 2012; 18(5):536-54. DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dms016. View

Zhang G, Yu H, Yu S, Luo X, Liang Y, Hou L . Association of size for gestational age and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate with cardiometabolic risk in central precocious puberty girls. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1131438. PMC: 10244634. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1131438. View

Mazur P . Stopping biological time. The freezing of living cells. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988; 541:514-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1988.tb22288.x. View

Ueno S, Uchiyama K, Kuroda T, Yabuuchi A, Ezoe K, Okimura T . Cryostorage duration does not affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: a retrospective single-centre cohort study of vitrified-warmed blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018; 36(6):614-619. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.03.008. View

Lee H, Park J, Paek S, Byun J, Song H, Lee H . Does duration of cryostorage affect survival rate, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes? Large-scale single-center study of slush nitrogen (SN ) vitrified-warmed blastocysts. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020; 152(3):351-357. DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.13381. View

Vajta G, Rienzi L, Ubaldi F . Open versus closed systems for vitrification of human oocytes and embryos. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015; 30(4):325-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.12.012. View

10.

Nelissen E, Van Montfoort A, Coonen E, Derhaag J, Geraedts J, Smits L . Further evidence that culture media affect perinatal outcome: findings after transfer of fresh and cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod. 2012; 27(7):1966-76. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des145. View

11.

Pinborg A, Henningsen A, Loft A, Malchau S, Forman J, Nyboe Andersen A . Large baby syndrome in singletons born after frozen embryo transfer (FET): is it due to maternal factors or the cryotechnique?. Hum Reprod. 2014; 29(3):618-27. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det440. View

12.

Wang X, Xiao Y, Tao T, Xiong W . Influence of maternal age on the birthweight of infants delivered from frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1195256. PMC: 10368368. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1195256. View

13.

Bielanski A, Bergeron H, Lau P, Devenish J . Microbial contamination of embryos and semen during long term banking in liquid nitrogen. Cryobiology. 2003; 46(2):146-52. DOI: 10.1016/s0011-2240(03)00020-8. View

14.

Iwatani M, Ikegami K, Kremenska Y, Hattori N, Tanaka S, Yagi S . Dimethyl sulfoxide has an impact on epigenetic profile in mouse embryoid body. Stem Cells. 2006; 24(11):2549-56. DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0427. View

15.

Cimadomo D, Fabozzi G, Dovere L, Maggiulli R, Albricci L, Innocenti F . Clinical, obstetric and perinatal outcomes after vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer are independent of cryo-storage duration. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021; 44(2):221-227. DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.09.027. View

16.

Mehta V, Patel J, Gupta R, Shah S, Banker M . One Plus One Is Better Than Two: Cumulative Reproductive Outcomes Are Better after Two Elective Single Blastocyst Embryo Transfers Compared to One Double Blastocyst Embryo Transfer. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2018; 11(2):161-168. PMC: 6094541. DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_117_17. View

17.

Levi-Setti P, Patrizio P, Scaravelli G . Evolution of human oocyte cryopreservation: slow freezing versus vitrification. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2016; 23(6):445-450. DOI: 10.1097/MED.0000000000000289. View

18.

Li J, Yin M, Wang B, Lin J, Chen Q, Wang N . The effect of storage time after vitrification on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes among 24 698 patients following the first embryo transfer cycles. Hum Reprod. 2020; 35(7):1675-1684. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deaa136. View

19.

Wirleitner B, Vanderzwalmen P, Bach M, Baramsai B, Neyer A, Schwerda D . The time aspect in storing vitrified blastocysts: its impact on survival rate, implantation potential and babies born. Hum Reprod. 2013; 28(11):2950-7. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/det361. View

20.

. Blastocyst culture and transfer in clinically assisted reproduction: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2018; 110(7):1246-1252. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.09.011. View