» Articles » PMID: 30135993

The Risk of Birth Defects Among Children Born After Vitrified Blastocyst Transfers and Those Born After Fresh and Vitrified Cleavage-stage Embryo Transfers

Overview
Date 2018 Aug 24
PMID 30135993
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To explore the risk of birth defects among children born after vitrified blastocyst transfers and those born after fresh and vitrified cleavage-stage embryo transfers.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted including infants born after fresh and vitrified day 3 embryo transfers and those born after vitrified day 5 or 6 blastocyst transfers from January 2005 through December 2016. The outcome measures included any birth defect, multiple birth defects and 13 individual categories of birth defects.

Results: Any birth defect occurred in 1.15% of infants born after fresh day 3 embryo transfers, 1.75% of infants born after vitrified day 3 embryo transfers, 1.60% of infants born after vitrified day 5 blastocyst transfers and 1.10% of infants born after vitrified day 6 blastocyst transfers. There was no difference in the risk of birth defects between vitrified blastocyst-stage transfers and vitrified cleavage-stage transfers (including day 5 vs. day 3 and day 6 vs. day 3) among all births or in only singletons or twins. For infants born after cleavage-stage embryo transfers at day 3, there was no difference in the risk of birth defects between fresh embryo transfers and vitrified embryo transfers among all births or in only singletons or twins.

Conclusions: Transfer of vitrified day 5 or 6 blastocysts does not increase the risk of birth defects compared with vitrified day 3 embryos. However, randomized control trials and follow-up studies of the long-term outcome of children born after blastocyst-stage transfers are needed to confirm the clinical safety of extending embryo culture to the blastocyst stage.

Citing Articles

Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of ICSI using pentoxifylline to identify viable spermatozoa in patients with frozen-thawed testicular spermatozoa.

Dong J, Yin M, Wu L, Wang T, Li M, Zhang W Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1364285.

PMID: 38812814 PMC: 11133548. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1364285.


Effect of post-vitrification cryopreservation duration on singleton birth-weight in frozen-thawed blastocysts transfer cycles.

Wang X, Xiao Y, Sun Z, Xiong W Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1366360.

PMID: 38745950 PMC: 11091412. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1366360.


The effect of an extended culture period on birth weight among singletons born after single or double vitrified embryo transfer.

Wang N, Lin K, Zhao X, Zhang P Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1184966.

PMID: 38567304 PMC: 10985195. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1184966.


Epidemiology of birth defects in a national hospital-based birth defect surveillance spot in Southern Jiangsu, China, 2014-2018.

Zhou Y, Yang D, Mao X, Zhou H, Wang L Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1138946.

PMID: 37766918 PMC: 10520965. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1138946.


Storage duration of vitrified embryos does not affect pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after frozen-thawed embryo transfer.

Li X, Guo P, Blockeel C, Li X, Deng L, Yang J Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1148411.

PMID: 36998477 PMC: 10043480. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1148411.