» Articles » PMID: 38738158

Navigating the Divide: A Comprehensive Review of the Mechanical and Anatomical Axis Approaches in Total Knee Replacement

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2024 May 13
PMID 38738158
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This comprehensive review explores the mechanical and anatomical axis approaches in total knee replacement (TKR) surgery, addressing the ongoing debate within the orthopedic community. Emphasizing the significance of TKR in alleviating knee-related disorders, this review underscores the pivotal role of accurate alignment in achieving optimal surgical outcomes. The purpose is to navigate the divide between the well-established mechanical axis approach, focusing on a straight-line alignment, and the anatomical axis approach, aligning with natural knee landmarks. The analysis delves into the advantages, disadvantages, and clinical implications of each approach, offering a nuanced perspective on their efficacy. The conclusion emphasizes a patient-centric approach, recommending the adoption of hybrid strategies and the incorporation of emerging technologies for enhanced precision. The future of TKR aligns with personalized medicine, leveraging advancements in computer-assisted navigation, robotics, and patient-specific implants. Ongoing professional development and interdisciplinary collaboration are crucial for surgeons, and as the field evolves, innovations in artificial intelligence, imaging, and 3D printing are expected to shape the trajectory of TKR alignment approaches.

Citing Articles

Knee Arthroscopy in the Era of Precision Medicine: A Comprehensive Review of Tailored Approaches and Emerging Technologies.

Rathod V, Shrivastav S, Gharpinde M Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e70932.

PMID: 39502973 PMC: 11537776. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.70932.


A method framework of semi-automatic knee bone segmentation and reconstruction from computed tomography (CT) images.

Humayun A, Rehman M, Liu B Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(10):7151-7175.

PMID: 39429595 PMC: 11485355. DOI: 10.21037/qims-24-821.

References
1.
Roussot M, Vles G, Oussedik S . Clinical outcomes of kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev. 2020; 5(8):486-497. PMC: 7484715. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190093. View

2.
Begum F, Kayani B, Magan A, Chang J, Haddad F . Current concepts in total knee arthroplasty : mechanical, kinematic, anatomical, and functional alignment. Bone Jt Open. 2021; 2(6):397-404. PMC: 8244789. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.26.BJO-2020-0162.R1. View

3.
Diez-Villanueva P, Salamanca J, Rojas A, Alfonso F . Importance of frailty and comorbidity in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2017; 14(6):379-382. PMC: 5540869. DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2017.06.005. View

4.
Yazdi H, Nazarian A, Kwon J, Hochman M, Pakdaman R, Hafezi P . Anatomical axes of the proximal and distal halves of the femur in a normally aligned healthy population: implications for surgery. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018; 13(1):21. PMC: 5793359. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-017-0710-0. View

5.
Unal M, Ercan S, Budeyri A, Toprak U, Salkaci A . Anatomical axis validation of lower extremity for different deformities: A radiological study. SAGE Open Med. 2020; 8:2050312120923822. PMC: 7297126. DOI: 10.1177/2050312120923822. View