» Articles » PMID: 38731749

Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Salmon Frame Proteins Using a Sequential Batch Operational Strategy: An Improvement in Water-Holding Capacity

Overview
Journal Foods
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2024 May 11
PMID 38731749
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The meat industry uses phosphates to improve the water-holding capacity (WHC) of meat products, although excess phosphates can be harmful to human health. In this sense, protein hydrolysates offer an alternative with scientific evidence of improved WHCs. Salmon frames, a byproduct rich in protein, must be processed for recovery. Enzymatic technology allows these proteins to be extracted from muscle, and the sequential batch strategy significantly increases protein nitrogen extraction. This study focused on evaluating the WHC of protein hydrolysates from salmon frames obtained through double- and triple-sequential batches compared to conventional hydrolysis. Hydrolysis was carried out for 3 h at 55 °C with 13 mAU of subtilisin per gram of salmon frames. The WHC of each hydrolysate was measured as the cooking loss using concentrations that varied from 0 to 5% (/) in the meat matrix. Compared with those obtained through conventional hydrolysis, the hydrolysates obtained through the strategy of double- and triple-sequence batches demonstrated a 55% and 51% reduction in cooking loss, respectively, when they were applied from 1% by weight in the meat matrix. It is essential to highlight that all hydrolysates had a significantly lower cooking loss ( ≤ 0.05) than that of the positive control (sodium tripolyphosphate [STPP]) at its maximum allowable limit when applied at a concentration of 5% in the meat matrix. These results suggest that the sequential batch strategy represents a promising alternative for further improving the WHC of hydrolysates compared to conventional hydrolysis. It may serve as a viable substitute for polyphosphates.

Citing Articles

Enzymatic Hydrolysis Systems Enhance the Efficiency and Biological Properties of Hydrolysates from Frozen Fish Processing Co-Products.

Sapatinha M, Camacho C, Pais-Costa A, Fernando A, Marques A, Pires C Mar Drugs. 2025; 23(1).

PMID: 39852515 PMC: 11766955. DOI: 10.3390/md23010014.


Inhibitory Effects of Gliadin Hydrolysates on BACE1 Expression and APP Processing to Prevent Aβ Aggregation.

Lin C, Hsieh C, Lai P, Huang C, Chung Y, Huang S Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(23).

PMID: 39684923 PMC: 11642305. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252313212.

References
1.
Valencia P, Valdivia S, Nunez S, Ovissipour R, Pinto M, Ramirez C . Assessing the Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Salmon Frame Proteins through Different By-Product/Water Ratios and pH Regimes. Foods. 2021; 10(12). PMC: 8702060. DOI: 10.3390/foods10123045. View

2.
Shuto E, Taketani Y, Tanaka R, Harada N, Isshiki M, Sato M . Dietary phosphorus acutely impairs endothelial function. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 20(7):1504-12. PMC: 2709683. DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2008101106. View

3.
Puolanne E, Halonen M . Theoretical aspects of water-holding in meat. Meat Sci. 2010; 86(1):151-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.04.038. View

4.
Shroff R . Phosphate is a vascular toxin. Pediatr Nephrol. 2012; 28(4):583-93. DOI: 10.1007/s00467-012-2347-x. View

5.
Nunez S, Cardenas C, Pinto M, Valencia P, Cataldo P, Guzman F . Bovine skin gelatin hydrolysates as potential substitutes for polyphosphates: The role of degree of hydrolysis and pH on water-holding capacity. J Food Sci. 2020; 85(7):1988-1996. DOI: 10.1111/1750-3841.15299. View