» Articles » PMID: 38727431

The Prediction of Quality of Life by Frailty and Disability Among Dutch Community-Dwelling People Aged 75 Years or Older

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 2024 May 10
PMID 38727431
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study aimed to examine the prediction of quality of life by frailty and disability in a baseline sample of 479 Dutch community-dwelling people aged 75 years or older using a follow-up period of 8 years. Regarding frailty, we distinguish between physical, psychological, and social frailty. Concerning physical disability, we distinguish between limitations in performing activities in daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities in daily living (IADL). The Tilburg Frailty Indicator (TFI) and the Groningen Activity Restriction Scale (GARS) were used to assess frailty domains and types of disability, respectively. Quality of life was determined by the WHOQOL-BREF containing physical, psychological, social, and environmental domains. In our study, 53.9% of participants were woman, and the mean age was 80.3 years (range 75-93). The study showed that psychological frailty predicted four domains of quality of life and physical frailty three. Social frailty was only found to be a significant predictor of social quality of life and environmental quality of life. ADL and IADL disability proved to be the worst predictors. It is recommended that primary healthcare professionals (e.g., general practitioners, district nurses) focus their interventions primarily on factors that can prevent or delay psychological and physical frailty, thereby ensuring that people's quality of life does not deteriorate.

Citing Articles

Development and Validation of a Game for Older Adults on Lifestyles and Frailty.

Faria A, Martins M, Laredo-Aguilera J, Ventura-Silva J, Ribeiro O Nurs Rep. 2024; 14(3):2499-2512.

PMID: 39311192 PMC: 11417926. DOI: 10.3390/nursrep14030184.


Frailty Assessment and Its Impact on Loneliness among Older Adults Receiving Home-Based Healthcare during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Klesiora M, Tsaras K, Papathanasiou I, Malliarou M, Bakalis N, Kourkouta L Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(16).

PMID: 39201224 PMC: 11353754. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12161666.

References
1.
Zhang X, Tan S, Bilajac L, Alhambra-Borras T, Garces-Ferrer J, Verma A . Reliability and Validity of the Tilburg Frailty Indicator in 5 European Countries. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020; 21(6):772-779.e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.03.019. View

2.
Vanleerberghe P, De Witte N, Claes C, Schalock R, Verte D . The quality of life of older people aging in place: a literature review. Qual Life Res. 2017; 26(11):2899-2907. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-017-1651-0. View

3.
Beltz S, Gloystein S, Litschko T, Laag S, Berg N . Multivariate analysis of independent determinants of ADL/IADL and quality of life in the elderly. BMC Geriatr. 2022; 22(1):894. PMC: 9682836. DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03621-3. View

4.
Kojima G . Frailty as a predictor of hospitalisation among community-dwelling older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016; 70(7):722-9. DOI: 10.1136/jech-2015-206978. View

5.
Ware Jr J, Sherbourne C . The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992; 30(6):473-83. View