» Articles » PMID: 38726199

A Novel Non-invasive Embryo Evaluation Method (NICS-Timelapse) with Enhanced Predictive Precision and Clinical Impact

Overview
Journal Heliyon
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2024 May 10
PMID 38726199
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The selection of the finest possible embryo in in-vitro fertilization (IVF) was crucial and revolutionary, particularly when just one embryo is transplanted to lessen the possibility of multiple pregnancies. However, practical usefulness of currently used methodologies may be constrained. Here, we established a novel non-invasive embryo evaluation method that combines non-invasive chromosomal screening (NICS) and Timelapse system along with artificial intelligence algorithms. With an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.94 and an accuracy of 0.88, the NICS-Timelapse model was able to predict blastocyst euploidy. The performance of the model was further evaluated using 75 patients in various clinical settings. The clinical pregnancy and live birth rates of embryos predicted by the NICS-Timelapse model, showing that embryos with higher euploid probabilities were associated with higher clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. These results demonstrated the NICS-Timelapse model's significantly wider application in clinical IVF due to its excellent accuracy and noninvasiveness.

Citing Articles

Non-invasive prediction of human embryonic ploidy using artificial intelligence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Xin X, Wu S, Xu H, Ma Y, Bao N, Gao M EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 77:102897.

PMID: 39513188 PMC: 11541425. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102897.

References
1.
Yeung Q, Zhang Y, Chung J, Lui W, Kwok Y, Gui B . A prospective study of non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (NiPGT-A) using next-generation sequencing (NGS) on spent culture media (SCM). J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019; 36(8):1609-1621. PMC: 6707994. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01517-7. View

2.
Tsai N, Chang Y, Su Y, Lin Y, Weng P, Cheng Y . Validation of Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Screening Using a Routine IVF Laboratory Workflow. Biomedicines. 2022; 10(6). PMC: 9219764. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10061386. View

3.
Guo Y, Liu Y, Qi L, Song W, Jin H . Can Time-Lapse Incubation and Monitoring Be Beneficial to Assisted Reproduction Technology Outcomes? A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Day 3 Double Embryo Transfer. Front Physiol. 2022; 12:794601. PMC: 8764165. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.794601. View

4.
Sato T, Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozawa F, Yamamoto T, Kato T, Kurahashi H . Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a comparison of live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss due to embryonic aneuploidy or recurrent implantation failure. Hum Reprod. 2019; 34(12):2340-2348. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez229. View

5.
Basile N, Vime P, Florensa M, Aparicio Ruiz B, Garcia Velasco J, Remohi J . The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of  implantation: a multicentric study to define and validate an algorithm for embryo selection. Hum Reprod. 2014; 30(2):276-83. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu331. View