» Articles » PMID: 30314885

Time-lapse Imaging Algorithms Rank Human Preimplantation Embryos According to the Probability of Live Birth

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2018 Oct 14
PMID 30314885
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Research Question: Can blastocysts leading to live births be ranked according to morphokinetic-based algorithms?

Design: Retrospective analysis of 781 single blastocyst embryo transfers, including all patient clinical factors that might be potential confounders for the primary outcome measure of live birth, was weighed using separate multi-variable logistic regression models.

Results: There was strong evidence of effect of embryo rank on odds of live birth. Embryos were classified A, B, C or D according to calculated variables; time to start (tSB) and duration (dB{tB - tSB}) of blastulation. Embryos of rank D were less likely to result in live birth than embryos of rank A (odds ratio [OR] 0.3046; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.129, 0.660; P < 0.005). Embryos ranked B were less likely to result in live birth than those ranked A (OR 0.7114; 95% Cl 0.505, 1.001; P < 0.01), and embryos ranked C were less likely to result in live birth than those ranked A (OR 0.6501, 95% Cl 0.373, 1.118; P < 0.01). Overall, the LRT (Likelihood Ratio Test) p-value for embryo rank shows that there is strong evidence that embryo rank is informative as a whole in discriminating between live birth and no live birth outcomes (p = 0.0101). The incidence of live birth was 52.5% from rank A, 39.2% from rank B, 31.4% from rank C and 13.2% from rank D.

Conclusions: Time-lapse imaging morphokinetic-based algorithms for blastocysts can provide objective hierarchical ranking of embryos for predicting live birth and may have greater discriminating power than conventional blastocyst morphology assessment.

Citing Articles

Predicting IVF live -birth probability using time-lapse data: Implications of including or excluding age in a day 2 embryo transfer model.

Sayed S, Petersen B, Reigstad M, Schwennicke A, Hausken J, Storeng R PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0318480.

PMID: 39999051 PMC: 11856505. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318480.


Steady morphokinetic progression is an independent predictor of live birth: a descriptive reference for euploid embryos.

Bayram A, Elkhatib I, Kalafat E, Abdala A, Ferracuti V, Melado L Hum Reprod Open. 2024; 2024(4):hoae059.

PMID: 39507416 PMC: 11540439. DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoae059.


Improving Deep Learning-Based Algorithm for Ploidy Status Prediction Through Combined U-NET Blastocyst Segmentation and Sequential Time-Lapse Blastocysts Images.

Handayani N, Danardono G, Boediono A, Wiweko B, Sini I, Sirait B J Reprod Infertil. 2024; 25(2):110-119.

PMID: 39157795 PMC: 11327420. DOI: 10.18502/jri.v25i2.16006.


A novel non-invasive embryo evaluation method (NICS-Timelapse) with enhanced predictive precision and clinical impact.

He H, Wu L, Chen Y, Li T, Ren X, Hu J Heliyon. 2024; 10(9):e30189.

PMID: 38726199 PMC: 11078863. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30189.


Optimal Embryo Selection: The Irreplaceable Role of the Embryologist in an Age of Advancing Technology.

Rauchfuss L, Zhao Y, Walker D, Galantis T, Fredrickson J, Barud K J Hum Reprod Sci. 2023; 16(3):227-232.

PMID: 38045503 PMC: 10688284. DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_98_23.