» Articles » PMID: 38724788

Defining and Measuring the Scope of Atopic Dermatitis

Overview
Date 2024 May 9
PMID 38724788
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Atopic dermatitis (AD) has no definitive diagnostic test and has a large range of phenotypes, making it a difficult disease to assess and define. However, an agreed-upon definition of AD is important for clinical trials, population-based studies, and clinical practice. Several diagnostic criteria systems have been proposed to fill these needs, with none considered the gold standard. To further aid in standardized assessment of AD patients, numerous disease severity and quality-of-life measurement tools have been proposed. There is similarly no gold standard and efforts are ongoing to develop a single consensus scale. Finally, assessment of AD-associated comorbidities, including allergic/immunologic conditions, psychiatric disorders, and metabolic/cardiac conditions, is important when evaluating this patient population.

References
1.
Kang K, Tian R . Criteria for atopic dermatitis in a Chinese population. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1989; 144:26-7. DOI: 10.2340/000155551891442627. View

2.
Diepgen T, Fartasch M, Hornstein O . Evaluation and relevance of atopic basic and minor features in patients with atopic dermatitis and in the general population. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1989; 144:50-4. DOI: 10.2340/000155551445054. View

3.
Schultz Larsen F, Hanifin J . Secular change in the occurrence of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh). 1992; 176:7-12. DOI: 102340/00015555176712. View

4.
Williams H, Burney P, Hay R, Archer C, Shipley M, Hunter J . The U.K. Working Party's Diagnostic Criteria for Atopic Dermatitis. I. Derivation of a minimum set of discriminators for atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 1994; 131(3):383-96. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1994.tb08530.x. View

5.
Williams H, Burney P, Pembroke A, Hay R . The U.K. Working Party's Diagnostic Criteria for Atopic Dermatitis. III. Independent hospital validation. Br J Dermatol. 1994; 131(3):406-16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1994.tb08532.x. View