» Articles » PMID: 38714708

Reverse Engineering Morphogenesis Through Bayesian Optimization of Physics-based Models

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 May 7
PMID 38714708
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Morphogenetic programs coordinate cell signaling and mechanical interactions to shape organs. In systems and synthetic biology, a key challenge is determining optimal cellular interactions for predicting organ shape, size, and function. Physics-based models defining the subcellular force distribution facilitate this, but it is challenging to calibrate parameters in these models from data. To solve this inverse problem, we created a Bayesian optimization framework to determine the optimal cellular force distribution such that the predicted organ shapes match the experimentally observed organ shapes. This integrative framework employs Gaussian Process Regression, a non-parametric kernel-based probabilistic machine learning modeling paradigm, to learn the mapping functions relating to the morphogenetic programs that maintain the final organ shape. We calibrated and tested the method on Drosophila wing imaginal discs to study mechanisms that regulate epithelial processes ranging from development to cancer. The parameter estimation framework successfully infers the underlying changes in core parameters needed to match simulation data with imaging data of wing discs perturbed with collagenase. The computational pipeline identifies distinct parameter sets mimicking wild-type shapes. It enables a global sensitivity analysis to support the regulation of actomyosin contractility and basal ECM stiffness to generate and maintain the curved shape of the wing imaginal disc. The optimization framework, combined with experimental imaging, identified that Piezo, a mechanosensitive ion channel, impacts fold formation by regulating the apical-basal balance of actomyosin contractility and elasticity of ECM. This workflow is extensible toward reverse-engineering morphogenesis across organ systems and for real-time control of complex multicellular systems.

Citing Articles

Piezo regulates epithelial topology and promotes precision in organ size control.

Mim M, Kumar N, Levis M, Unger M, Miranda G, Gazzo D Cell Rep. 2024; 43(7):114398.

PMID: 38935502 PMC: 11606527. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114398.

References
1.
Tonner P, Darnell C, Engelhardt B, Schmid A . Detecting differential growth of microbial populations with Gaussian process regression. Genome Res. 2016; 27(2):320-333. PMC: 5287237. DOI: 10.1101/gr.210286.116. View

2.
Mim M, Kumar N, Levis M, Unger M, Miranda G, Gazzo D . Piezo regulates epithelial topology and promotes precision in organ size control. Cell Rep. 2024; 43(7):114398. PMC: 11606527. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114398. View

3.
Storgel N, Krajnc M, Mrak P, Strus J, Ziherl P . Quantitative Morphology of Epithelial Folds. Biophys J. 2016; 110(1):269-77. PMC: 4825108. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.11.024. View

4.
Anderson A, Ellis B, Weiss J . Verification, validation and sensitivity studies in computational biomechanics. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2007; 10(3):171-84. PMC: 3361760. DOI: 10.1080/10255840601160484. View

5.
Roca-Cusachs P, Iskratsch T, Sheetz M . Finding the weakest link: exploring integrin-mediated mechanical molecular pathways. J Cell Sci. 2012; 125(Pt 13):3025-38. PMC: 6518164. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.095794. View