» Articles » PMID: 38713263

A Novel Artificial Intelligence-based Endoscopic Ultrasonography Diagnostic System for Diagnosing the Invasion Depth of Early Gastric Cancer

Abstract

Background: We developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-based endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) system for diagnosing the invasion depth of early gastric cancer (EGC), and we evaluated the performance of this system.

Methods: A total of 8280 EUS images from 559 EGC cases were collected from 11 institutions. Within this dataset, 3451 images (285 cases) from one institution were used as a development dataset. The AI model consisted of segmentation and classification steps, followed by the CycleGAN method to bridge differences in EUS images captured by different equipment. AI model performance was evaluated using an internal validation dataset collected from the same institution as the development dataset (1726 images, 135 cases). External validation was conducted using images collected from the other 10 institutions (3103 images, 139 cases).

Results: The area under the curve (AUC) of the AI model in the internal validation dataset was 0.870 (95% CI: 0.796-0.944). Regarding diagnostic performance, the accuracy/sensitivity/specificity values of the AI model, experts (n = 6), and nonexperts (n = 8) were 82.2/63.4/90.4%, 81.9/66.3/88.7%, and 68.3/60.9/71.5%, respectively. The AUC of the AI model in the external validation dataset was 0.815 (95% CI: 0.743-0.886). The accuracy/sensitivity/specificity values of the AI model (74.1/73.1/75.0%) and the real-time diagnoses of experts (75.5/79.1/72.2%) in the external validation dataset were comparable.

Conclusions: Our AI model demonstrated a diagnostic performance equivalent to that of experts.

Citing Articles

Invasion and metastasis in cancer: molecular insights and therapeutic targets.

Li Y, Liu F, Cai Q, Deng L, OuYang Q, Zhang X Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2025; 10(1):57.

PMID: 39979279 PMC: 11842613. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-025-02148-4.


Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Ultrasound: Current Developments, Limitations and Future Directions.

Wu Y, Ramai D, Smith E, Mega P, Qatomah A, Spadaccini M Cancers (Basel). 2025; 16(24.

PMID: 39766095 PMC: 11674484. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16244196.

References
1.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A . Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71(3):209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660. View

2.
Cardoso R, Coburn N, Seevaratnam R, Sutradhar R, Lourenco L, Mahar A . A systematic review and meta-analysis of the utility of EUS for preoperative staging for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2012; 15 Suppl 1:S19-26. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-011-0115-4. View

3.
Yanai H, Fujimura H, Suzumi M, Matsuura S, Awaya N, Noguchi T . Delineation of the gastric muscularis mucosae and assessment of depth of invasion of early gastric cancer using a 20-megahertz endoscopic ultrasound probe. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993; 39(4):505-12. DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(93)70160-1. View

4.
Tsujii Y, Kato M, Inoue T, Yoshii S, Nagai K, Fujinaga T . Integrated diagnostic strategy for the invasion depth of early gastric cancer by conventional endoscopy and EUS. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 82(3):452-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2015.01.022. View

5.
Tsujii Y, Hayashi Y, Ishihara R, Yamaguchi S, Yamamoto M, Inoue T . Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography for the depth of gastric cancer suspected of submucosal invasion: a multicenter prospective study. Surg Endosc. 2022; 37(4):3018-3028. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09778-7. View