» Articles » PMID: 38712263

Sex Differences in the Functional Network Underpinnings of Psychotic-like Experiences in Children

Overview
Journal bioRxiv
Date 2024 May 7
PMID 38712263
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) include a range of sub-threshold symptoms that resemble aspects of psychosis but do not necessarily indicate the presence of psychiatric illness. These experiences are highly prevalent in youth and are associated with developmental disruptions across social, academic, and emotional domains. While not all youth who report PLEs develop psychosis, many develop other psychiatric illnesses during adolescence and adulthood. As such, PLEs are theorized to represent early markers of poor mental health. Here, we characterized the similarities and differences in the neurobiological underpinnings of childhood PLEs across the sexes using a large sample from the ABCD Study (n=5,260), revealing sex-specific associations between functional networks connectivity and PLEs. We find that although the networks associated with PLEs overlap to some extent across the sexes, there are also crucial differences. In females, PLEs are associated with dispersed cortical and non-cortical connections, whereas in males, they are primarily associated with functional connections within limbic, temporal parietal, somato/motor, and visual networks. These results suggest that early transdiagnostic markers of psychopathology may be distinct across the sexes, further emphasizing the need to consider sex in psychiatric research as well as clinical practice.

References
1.
Healy C, Brannigan R, Dooley N, Coughlan H, Clarke M, Kelleher I . Childhood and adolescent psychotic experiences and risk of mental disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Med. 2019; 49(10):1589-1599. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291719000485. View

2.
Dhamala E, Jamison K, Jaywant A, Kuceyeski A . Shared functional connections within and between cortical networks predict cognitive abilities in adult males and females. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021; 43(3):1087-1102. PMC: 8764478. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25709. View

3.
Wierenga L, Ruigrok A, Aksnes E, Barth C, Beck D, Burke S . Recommendations for a Better Understanding of Sex and Gender in the Neuroscience of Mental Health. Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2024; 4(2):100283. PMC: 10837069. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2023.100283. View

4.
Dale A, Fischl B, Sereno M . Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage. 1999; 9(2):179-94. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0395. View

5.
Ricard J, Parker T, Dhamala E, Kwasa J, Allsop A, Holmes A . Confronting racially exclusionary practices in the acquisition and analyses of neuroimaging data. Nat Neurosci. 2022; 26(1):4-11. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-022-01218-y. View