» Articles » PMID: 38710648

Nudging Intensive Care Unit Personnel Towards Sustainable Behaviour

Overview
Journal Nurs Crit Care
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2024 May 6
PMID 38710648
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The health care sector is among the most carbon-intensive sectors, contributing to societal problems like climate change. Previous research demonstrated that especially the use of personal protective equipment (e.g., aprons) in critical care contributes to this problem. To reduce personal protective equipment waste, new sustainable policies are needed. Policies are only effective if people comply.

Aim: Our aim is to examine whether compliance with sustainable policies in critical care can be increased through behavioural influencing. Specifically, we examined the effectiveness of two sets of nudges (i.e., a Prime + Visual prompt nudge and a Social norm nudge) on decreasing apron usage in an intensive care unit (ICU).

Study Design: We conducted a field experiment with a pre- and post-intervention measurement. Upon the introduction of the new sustainable policy, apron usage data were collected for 9 days before (132 observations) and 9 days after (114 observations) the nudge interventions were implemented.

Results: Neither the Prime + Visual prompt nudge, nor the Social norm nudge decreased apron usage.

Conclusions: While previous studies have found that primes, visual nudges and social norm nudges can increase sustainable behaviour, we did not find evidence for this in our ICU field experiment. Future research is needed to determine whether this null finding reflects reality, or whether it was due to methodological decisions and limitations of the presented experiment.

Relevance To Clinical Practice: The presented study highlights the importance of studying behavioural interventions that were previously proven successful in the lab and in other field contexts, in the complex setting of critical care. Results previously found in other contexts may not generalize directly to a critical care context. The unique characteristics of the critical care context also pose methodological challenges that may have affected the outcomes of this experiment.

Citing Articles

The green ICU: how to interpret green? A multiple perspective approach.

Smale E, Baid H, Balan M, McGain F, McAlistar S, De Waele J Crit Care. 2025; 29(1):80.

PMID: 39972357 PMC: 11837716. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-025-05316-8.


Nudging intensive care unit personnel towards sustainable behaviour.

Van Der Zee S, Verhoog T, Post T, Garcia-Gomez P, van Raaij E, Diehl J Nurs Crit Care. 2024; 30(1):37-46.

PMID: 38710648 PMC: 11783344. DOI: 10.1111/nicc.13086.

References
1.
Nigbur D, Lyons E, Uzzell D . Attitudes, norms, identity and environmental behaviour: using an expanded theory of planned behaviour to predict participation in a kerbside recycling programme. Br J Soc Psychol. 2009; 49(Pt 2):259-84. DOI: 10.1348/014466609X449395. View

2.
Venema T, Kroese F, Benjamins J, de Ridder D . When in Doubt, Follow the Crowd? Responsiveness to Social Proof Nudges in the Absence of Clear Preferences. Front Psychol. 2020; 11:1385. PMC: 7325907. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01385. View

3.
Sussman R, Gifford R . Please turn off the lights: the effectiveness of visual prompts. Appl Ergon. 2011; 43(3):596-603. DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.09.008. View

4.
Jacobson R, Mortensen C, Cialdini R . Bodies obliged and unbound: differentiated response tendencies for injunctive and descriptive social norms. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010; 100(3):433-48. DOI: 10.1037/a0021470. View

5.
Morgan T, Laland K . The biological bases of conformity. Front Neurosci. 2012; 6:87. PMC: 3375089. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00087. View