» Articles » PMID: 38699591

The Role of Economic Evaluations in Advancing HIV Multipurpose Prevention Technologies in Early-stage Development

Overview
Date 2024 May 3
PMID 38699591
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Product development is a high-risk undertaking, especially so when investments are prioritized for low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where markets may be smaller, fragile, and resource-constrained. New HIV prevention technologies, such as the dapivirine vaginal ring (DVR) and long-acting injectable cabotegravir (CAB-LA), are being introduced to these markets with one indication, meeting different needs of groups such as adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) and female sex workers (FSWs) in settings with high HIV burden. However, limited supply and demand have made their uptake a challenge. Economic evaluations conducted before Phase III trials can help optimize the potential public health value proposition of products in early-stage research and development (R&D), targeting investments in the development pathway that result in products likely to be available and taken up. Public investors in the HIV prevention pipeline, in particular those focused on innovative presentations such as multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs), can leverage early economic evaluations to understand the intrinsic uncertainty in market characterization. In this perspective piece, we reflect on the role of economic evaluations in early product development and on methodological considerations that are central to these analyses. We also discuss methods, in quantitative and qualitative research that can be deployed in early economic evaluations to address uncertainty, with examples applied to the development of future technologies for HIV prevention and MPTs.

References
1.
Nachega J, Scarsi K, Gandhi M, Scott R, Mofenson L, Archary M . Long-acting antiretrovirals and HIV treatment adherence. Lancet HIV. 2023; 10(5):e332-e342. PMC: 10734401. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(23)00051-6. View

2.
Poland B, Wada R . Combining drug-disease and economic modelling to inform drug development decisions. Drug Discov Today. 2001; 6(22):1165-1170. DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6446(01)02014-1. View

3.
Annemans L, Redekop K, Payne K . Current methodological issues in the economic assessment of personalized medicine. Value Health. 2013; 16(6 Suppl):S20-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.06.008. View

4.
Nel A, van Niekerk N, Kapiga S, Bekker L, Gama C, Gill K . Safety and Efficacy of a Dapivirine Vaginal Ring for HIV Prevention in Women. N Engl J Med. 2016; 375(22):2133-2143. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602046. View

5.
Vallejo-Torres L, Steuten L, Parkinson B, Girling A, Buxton M . Integrating health economics into the product development cycle: a case study of absorbable pins for treating hallux valgus. Med Decis Making. 2010; 31(4):596-610. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X10388041. View