» Articles » PMID: 37351685

The Future of Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV Prevention: A Global Qualitative Consultation on Provider Perspectives on New Products and Differentiated Service Delivery

Overview
Journal AIDS Behav
Date 2023 Jun 23
PMID 37351685
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Differentiated service delivery and new products, such as long-acting injectable cabotegravir (CAB-LA) and the dapivirine vaginal ring (DVR), could increase uptake and use of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention. We explored PrEP provider perspectives on differentiated PrEP service delivery and new PrEP products to inform World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines and programme implementation. 150 PrEP providers who participated in a WHO survey were randomly selected and 67 were invited for interviews based on geographic representation, provider cadre, gender, experience with community-based PrEP service delivery, and familiarity with new PrEP products. Semi-structured interviews were conducted virtually. Key themes were inductively extracted relating to differentiated service delivery and benefits and concerns regarding new PrEP products. 30 PrEP providers from 24 countries were interviewed. Across regions, providers were supportive of differentiated service delivery to respond to clients' needs and preferences, maintain services during COVID-19, and ensure access for priority populations that may face access challenges. Providers welcomed prospects of offering CAB-LA to their clients but had concerns about HIV testing, costs, and the need for clinic-based services, including staff who can administer injections. Providers felt the DVR was potentially important for some cisgender women, especially young clients and female sex workers, and raised fewer concerns compared to injectable PrEP. Providers' views are critical for the development of guidelines and implementing programmes that will best serve PrEP users. Understanding areas where provider capacities and biases may create barriers can define opportunities for training and support to ensure that providers can deliver effective programmes.

Citing Articles

Preference for Long-Acting Injectable PrEP Compared With Daily Oral PrEP Among Transgender Women in the U.S.: Findings From a Multisite Cohort.

Cooney E, Reisner S, Poteat T, Radix A, Mayer K, Beyrer C AJPM Focus. 2025; 4(2):100313.

PMID: 40051448 PMC: 11880704. DOI: 10.1016/j.focus.2025.100313.


Location Preferences for Accessing Long-Acting Injectable Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (LA-PrEP) Among Men Who Have Sex With Men (MSM) Currently on Daily Oral PrEP.

Glick J, Nestadt D, Sanchez T, Li K, Hannah M, Rawlings M J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care. 2024; 23:23259582241293336.

PMID: 39698980 PMC: 11788811. DOI: 10.1177/23259582241293336.


Understanding the Drivers of CAB PrEP Uptake and Use among Women in sub-Saharan Africa to Build Demand for New PrEP Methods.

Bishopp C, Mungai-Barris Z, Briedenhann E, Donaldson E, Irungu E, Schwartz K Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2024; 22(1):7.

PMID: 39644439 PMC: 11625055. DOI: 10.1007/s11904-024-00715-y.


Leveraging international stakeholders' experiences with oral PrEP costs to accelerate implementation of the monthly dapivirine vaginal ring: A qualitative study.

Heck C, Kripke K, Dam A, Torres-Rueda S, Bozzani F, Obermeyer C Health Res Policy Syst. 2024; 22(1):156.

PMID: 39587579 PMC: 11587620. DOI: 10.1186/s12961-024-01240-5.


Acceptability of six-monthly PrEP dispensing supported with interim HIV self-testing to simplify PrEP delivery in Kenya: findings from qualitative research.

Thuo N, Bardon A, Mogere P, Kiptinness C, Casmir E, Wairimu N BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):1281.

PMID: 39448999 PMC: 11515400. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11521-y.


References
1.
Ahluwalia A, Inzaule S, Baggaley R, Vitoria M, Schaefer R, Schmidt H . Characterization of dolutegravir drug resistance in persons diagnosed with HIV after exposure to long-acting injectable cabotegravir for preexposure prophylaxis. AIDS. 2022; 36(13):1897-1898. PMC: 9594132. DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003322. View

2.
Schaefer R, Schmidt H, Ravasi G, Mozalevskis A, Rewari B, Lule F . Adoption of guidelines on and use of oral pre-exposure prophylaxis: a global summary and forecasting study. Lancet HIV. 2021; 8(8):e502-e510. PMC: 8332196. DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(21)00127-2. View

3.
Calabrese S, Tekeste M, Mayer K, Magnus M, Krakower D, Kershaw T . Considering Stigma in the Provision of HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis: Reflections from Current Prescribers. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2019; 33(2):79-88. PMC: 6386080. DOI: 10.1089/apc.2018.0166. View

4.
Pleuhs B, Quinn K, Walsh J, Petroll A, John S . Health Care Provider Barriers to HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis in the United States: A Systematic Review. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2020; 34(3):111-123. PMC: 7087402. DOI: 10.1089/apc.2019.0189. View

5.
Wisutep P, Sirijatuphat R, Navanukroh O, Phatharodom P, Werarak P, Rattanasuwan W . Attitudes towards, knowledge about, and confidence to prescribe antiretroviral pre-exposure prophylaxis among healthcare providers in Thailand. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 100(49):e28120. PMC: 8663816. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028120. View