Improvement in Axial Rotation with Bracing Reduces the Risk of Curve Progression in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Overview

Journal Spine Deform

Publisher Springer Nature

Date 2024 May 2

PMID 38698106

Authors

Michael W Fields

Christina C Rymond

Matan S Malka

Ritt R Givens

Matthew E Simhon

Hiroko Matsumoto

Gerard F Marciano

Afrain Z Boby

Benjamin D Roye

Michael G Vitale

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: New evidence highlights the significance of 3D in-brace correction for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) patients. This study explores how axial parameters relate to treatment failure in braced AIS patients.

Methods: AIS patients (Sanders 1-5) undergoing Rigo-Chêneau bracing at a single institution were included. Axial vertebral rotation (AVR) was determined by utilizing pre-brace and in-brace 3D reconstructions from EOS® radiographs. The primary outcome was treatment failure: surgery or coronal curve progression > 5°. Minimum follow-up was two years.

Results: 75 patients (81% female) were included. Mean age at bracing initiation was 12.8 ± 1.3 years and patients had a pre-brace major curve of 31.0° ± 6.5°. 25 patients (76% female) experienced curve progression > 5°, and 18/25 required surgical intervention. The treatment failure group had larger in-brace AVR than the success group (5.8° ± 4.1° vs. 9.9° ± 7.6°, p = 0.003), but also larger initial coronal curve measures. In-brace AVR did not appear to be associated with treatment failure after adjusting for the pre-brace major curve (Hazard Ratio (HR):0.99, 95% Confidence Interval (CI):0.94-1.05, p = 0.833). Adjusting for pre-brace major curve, patients with AVR improvement with bracing had an 85% risk reduction in treatment failure versus those without (HR:0.15, 95% CI:0.02-1.13, p = 0.066). At the final follow-up, 42/50 (84%) patients without progression had Sanders ≥ 7.

Conclusions: While in-brace rotation was not an independent predictor of curve progression (due to its correlation with curve magnitude), improved AVR with bracing was a significant predictor of curve progression. This study is the first step toward investigating the interplay between 3D parameters, skeletal maturity, compliance, and brace efficacy, allowing a future prospective multicenter study.

Level Of Evidence: Retrospective study; Level III.

References

Matsumoto H, Warren S, Simhon M, Konigsberg M, Fields M, Roye B . It is not just about the frontal plane: sagittal parameters impact curve progression in AIS patients undergoing brace treatment. Spine Deform. 2020; 8(5):921-929. DOI: 10.1007/s43390-020-00122-4. View

Stokes I . Three-dimensional terminology of spinal deformity. A report presented to the Scoliosis Research Society by the Scoliosis Research Society Working Group on 3-D terminology of spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994; 19(2):236-48. View

Zaborowska-Sapeta K, Kowalski I, Kotwicki T, Protasiewicz-Faldowska H, Kiebzak W . Effectiveness of Chêneau brace treatment for idiopathic scoliosis: prospective study in 79 patients followed to skeletal maturity. Scoliosis. 2011; 6(1):2. PMC: 3037926. DOI: 10.1186/1748-7161-6-2. View

Ovadia D, Eylon S, Mashiah A, Wientroub S, Lebel E . Factors associated with the success of the Rigo System Chêneau brace in treating mild to moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Child Orthop. 2013; 6(4):327-31. PMC: 3425705. DOI: 10.1007/s11832-012-0429-8. View

Roye B, Simhon M, Matsumoto H, Bakarania P, Berdishevsky H, Dolan L . Establishing consensus on the best practice guidelines for the use of bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform. 2020; 8(4):597-604. DOI: 10.1007/s43390-020-00060-1. View

Drerup B . Principles of measurement of vertebral rotation from frontal projections of the pedicles. J Biomech. 1984; 17(12):923-35. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(84)90005-8. View

Lam G, Hill D, Le L, Raso J, Lou E . Vertebral rotation measurement: a summary and comparison of common radiographic and CT methods. Scoliosis. 2008; 3:16. PMC: 2587463. DOI: 10.1186/1748-7161-3-16. View

Nash Jr C, Moe J . A study of vertebral rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969; 51(2):223-9. View

Stokes I, Bigalow L, Moreland M . Measurement of axial rotation of vertebrae in scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986; 11(3):213-8. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198604000-00006. View

10.

Chi W, Cheng C, Yeh W, Chuang S, Chang T, Chen J . Vertebral axial rotation measurement method. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2005; 81(1):8-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2005.10.004. View

11.

Birchall D, Hughes D, Hindle J, Robinson L, Williamson J . Measurement of vertebral rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997; 22(20):2403-7. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199710150-00016. View

12.

Leong J, Day G, Luk K, Freedman L, Ho E . Nine-year mean follow-up of one-stage anteroposterior excision of hemivertebrae in the lumbosacral spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993; 18(14):2069-74. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199310001-00025. View

13.

Aaro S, Dahlborn M . Estimation of vertebral rotation and the spinal and rib cage deformity in scoliosis by computer tomography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1981; 6(5):460-7. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198109000-00007. View

14.

Deschenes S, Charron G, Beaudoin G, Labelle H, Dubois J, Miron M . Diagnostic imaging of spinal deformities: reducing patients radiation dose with a new slot-scanning X-ray imager. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010; 35(9):989-94. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181bdcaa4. View

15.

Vidal C, Ilharreborde B, Azoulay R, Sebag G, Mazda K . Reliability of cervical lordosis and global sagittal spinal balance measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2013; 22(6):1362-7. PMC: 3676559. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2752-2. View

16.

Al-Aubaidi Z, Lebel D, Oudjhane K, Zeller R . Three-dimensional imaging of the spine using the EOS system: is it reliable? A comparative study using computed tomography imaging. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2013; 22(5):409-12. DOI: 10.1097/BPB.0b013e328361ae5b. View

17.

Courvoisier A, Drevelle X, Dubousset J, Skalli W . Transverse plane 3D analysis of mild scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2013; 22(11):2427-32. PMC: 3886524. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-2862-x. View

18.

Nault M, Mac-Thiong J, Roy-Beaudry M, Turgeon I, Deguise J, Labelle H . Three-dimensional spinal morphology can differentiate between progressive and nonprogressive patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis at the initial presentation: a prospective study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014; 39(10):E601-6. PMC: 4047302. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000284. View

19.

Behensky H, Cole A, Freeman B, Grevitt M, Mehdian H, Webb J . Fixed lumbar apical vertebral rotation predicts spinal decompensation in Lenke type 3C adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after selective posterior thoracic correction and fusion. Eur Spine J. 2007; 16(10):1570-8. PMC: 2078319. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0397-8. View

20.

Aronsson D, Stokes I, Ronchetti P, Richards B . Surgical correction of vertebral axial rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: prediction by lateral bending films. J Spinal Disord. 1996; 9(3):214-9. View