» Articles » PMID: 18976498

Vertebral Rotation Measurement: a Summary and Comparison of Common Radiographic and CT Methods

Overview
Journal Scoliosis
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2008 Nov 4
PMID 18976498
Citations 54
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Current research has provided a more comprehensive understanding of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) as a three-dimensional spinal deformity, encompassing both lateral and rotational components. Apart from quantifying curve severity using the Cobb angle, vertebral rotation has become increasingly prominent in the study of scoliosis. It demonstrates significance in both preoperative and postoperative assessment, providing better appreciation of the impact of bracing or surgical interventions. In the past, the need for computer resources, digitizers and custom software limited studies of rotation to research performed after a patient left the scoliosis clinic. With advanced technology, however, rotation measurements are now more feasible. While numerous vertebral rotation measurement methods have been developed and tested, thorough comparisons of these are still relatively unexplored. This review discusses the advantages and disadvantages of six common measurement techniques based on technology most pertinent in clinical settings: radiography (Cobb, Nash-Moe, Perdriolle and Stokes' method) and computer tomography (CT) imaging (Aaro-Dahlborn and Ho's method). Better insight into the clinical suitability of rotation measurement methods currently available is presented, along with a discussion of critical concerns that should be addressed in future studies and development of new methods.

Citing Articles

A new method to assess lumbar vertebral body rotation on simple radiographs.

Lee S, Joung S, Kim S, Lee H, Deslivia M J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2025; 15(4):455-459.

PMID: 40061201 PMC: 11888028. DOI: 10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_171_24.


A horizontal and perpendicular interlaminar approach for intrathecal nusinersen injection in patients with spinal muscular atrophy and scoliosis: an observational study.

Huang C, Zhang Y, Diedrich D, Li J, Luo W, Zhao X Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2024; 19(1):268.

PMID: 39010073 PMC: 11250962. DOI: 10.1186/s13023-024-03278-8.


Improvement in axial rotation with bracing reduces the risk of curve progression in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Fields M, Rymond C, Malka M, Givens R, Simhon M, Matsumoto H Spine Deform. 2024; 12(5):1345-1353.

PMID: 38698106 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-024-00888-x.


Prevalence, distribution characteristic and risk factors of lumbar vertebral axial rotation in patients with lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study.

Zhao S, Yao Z, Wang Q, Huang P, Tu Z, Xie F Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):7909.

PMID: 38575582 PMC: 10995131. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-55826-8.


Using Electric Stimulation of the Spinal Muscles and Electromyography during Motor Tasks for Evaluation of the Role in Development and Progression of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis.

Wong C, Shayestehpour H, Koutras C, Dahl B, Otaduy M, Rasmussen J J Clin Med. 2024; 13(6).

PMID: 38541983 PMC: 10971464. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13061758.


References
1.
Kuklo T, Potter B, Lenke L . Vertebral rotation and thoracic torsion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: what is the best radiographic correlate?. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005; 18(2):139-47. DOI: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000159033.89623.bc. View

2.
Drerup B . Improvements in measuring vertebral rotation from the projections of the pedicles. J Biomech. 1985; 18(5):369-78. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(85)90292-1. View

3.
Stokes I, Bigalow L, Moreland M . Measurement of axial rotation of vertebrae in scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986; 11(3):213-8. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198604000-00006. View

4.
Negrini S, Negrini A, Atanasio S, Santambrogio G . Three-dimensional easy morphological (3-DEMO) classification of scoliosis, part I. Scoliosis. 2006; 1:20. PMC: 1764765. DOI: 10.1186/1748-7161-1-20. View

5.
Marchesi D, Transfeldt E, Bradford D, Heithoff K . Changes in vertebral rotation after Harrington and Luque instrumentation for idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992; 17(7):775-80. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199207000-00009. View