» Articles » PMID: 38697164

Considerations for Using Potential Surrogate Endpoints in Cancer Screening Trials

Overview
Journal Lancet Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 May 2
PMID 38697164
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The requirement of large-scale expensive cancer screening trials spanning decades creates considerable barriers to the development, commercialisation, and implementation of novel screening tests. One way to address these problems is to use surrogate endpoints for the ultimate endpoint of interest, cancer mortality, at an earlier timepoint. This Review aims to highlight the issues underlying the choice and use of surrogate endpoints for cancer screening trials, to propose criteria for when and how we might use such endpoints, and to suggest possible candidates. We present the current landscape and challenges, and discuss lessons and shortcomings from the therapeutic trial setting. It is hugely challenging to validate a surrogate endpoint, even with carefully designed clinical studies. Nevertheless, we consider whether there are candidates that might satisfy the requirements defined by research and regulatory bodies.

Citing Articles

Bedside implications of the use of surrogate endpoints in solid and haematological cancers: implications for our reliance on PFS, DFS, ORR, MRD and more.

Olivier T, Haslam A, Ochoa D, Fernandez E, Prasad V BMJ Oncol. 2025; 3(1):e000364.

PMID: 39886154 PMC: 11557723. DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000364.


Towards replicability and sustainability in cancer research.

Grimes D BJC Rep. 2024; 2(1):65.

PMID: 39516681 PMC: 11524053. DOI: 10.1038/s44276-024-00090-6.


Early detection of pancreatic cancer: Study design and analytical considerations in biomarker discovery and early phase validation studies.

Smith L, Mahoney D, Bamlet W, Yu F, Liu S, Goggins M Pancreatology. 2024; 24(8):1265-1279.

PMID: 39516175 PMC: 11780679. DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2024.10.012.


Technology and Future of Multi-Cancer Early Detection.

Milner Jr D, Lennerz J Life (Basel). 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 39063587 PMC: 11277619. DOI: 10.3390/life14070833.


Alternative endpoints to mortality in cancer screening trials.

Kumar S Mol Oncol. 2024; 18(8):1817-1820.

PMID: 38970563 PMC: 11306507. DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.13697.

References
1.
Menon U, Gentry-Maharaj A, Burnell M, Ryan A, Singh N, Manchanda R . Tumour stage, treatment, and survival of women with high-grade serous tubo-ovarian cancer in UKCTOCS: an exploratory analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2023; 24(9):1018-1028. PMC: 7616829. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00335-2. View

2.
Guerra C, Sharma P, Castillo B . Multi-Cancer Early Detection: The New Frontier in Cancer Early Detection. Annu Rev Med. 2023; 75:67-81. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-050522-033624. View

3.
Landy R, Pesola F, Castanon A, Sasieni P . Impact of cervical screening on cervical cancer mortality: estimation using stage-specific results from a nested case-control study. Br J Cancer. 2016; 115(9):1140-1146. PMC: 5117785. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.290. View

4.
Buyse M, Molenberghs G, Paoletti X, Oba K, Alonso A, Van der Elst W . Statistical evaluation of surrogate endpoints with examples from cancer clinical trials. Biom J. 2015; 58(1):104-32. DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201400049. View

5.
Gogineni V, Morand S, Staats H, Royfman R, Devanaboyina M, Einloth K . Current Ovarian Cancer Maintenance Strategies and Promising New Developments. J Cancer. 2021; 12(1):38-53. PMC: 7738841. DOI: 10.7150/jca.49406. View