» Articles » PMID: 38683871

KmerAperture: Retaining K-mer Synteny for Alignment-free Extraction of Core and Accessory Differences Between Bacterial Genomes

Overview
Journal PLoS Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2024 Apr 29
PMID 38683871
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

By decomposing genome sequences into k-mers, it is possible to estimate genome differences without alignment. Techniques such as k-mer minimisers, for example MinHash, have been developed and are often accurate approximations of distances based on full k-mer sets. These and other alignment-free methods avoid the large temporal and computational expense of alignment. However, these k-mer set comparisons are not entirely accurate within-species and can be completely inaccurate within-lineage. This is due, in part, to their inability to distinguish core polymorphism from accessory differences. Here we present a new approach, KmerAperture, which uses information on the k-mer relative genomic positions to determine the type of polymorphism causing differences in k-mer presence and absence between pairs of genomes. Single SNPs are expected to result in k unique contiguous k-mers per genome. On the other hand, contiguous series > k may be caused by accessory differences of length S-k+1; when the start and end of the sequence are contiguous with homologous sequence. Alternatively, they may be caused by multiple SNPs within k bp from each other and KmerAperture can determine whether that is the case. To demonstrate use cases KmerAperture was benchmarked using datasets including a very low diversity simulated population with accessory content independent from the number of SNPs, a simulated population where SNPs are spatially dense, a moderately diverse real cluster of genomes (Escherichia coli ST1193) with a large accessory genome and a low diversity real genome cluster (Salmonella Typhimurium ST34). We show that KmerAperture can accurately distinguish both core and accessory sequence diversity without alignment, outperforming other k-mer based tools.

References
1.
Nagarajan N, Pop M . Sequence assembly demystified. Nat Rev Genet. 2013; 14(3):157-67. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3367. View

2.
Didelot X, Parkhill J . A scalable analytical approach from bacterial genomes to epidemiology. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022; 377(1861):20210246. PMC: 9393561. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0246. View

3.
van der Putten B, Huijsmans N, Mende D, Schultsz C . Benchmarking the topological accuracy of bacterial phylogenomic workflows using evolution. Microb Genom. 2022; 8(3). PMC: 9176278. DOI: 10.1099/mgen.0.000799. View

4.
Didelot X, Bowden R, Wilson D, Peto T, Crook D . Transforming clinical microbiology with bacterial genome sequencing. Nat Rev Genet. 2012; 13(9):601-612. PMC: 5049685. DOI: 10.1038/nrg3226. View

5.
Vernikos G, Medini D, Riley D, Tettelin H . Ten years of pan-genome analyses. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2014; 23:148-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.mib.2014.11.016. View