» Articles » PMID: 38655137

Electron FLASH Radiotherapy in Vivo Studies. A Systematic Review

Overview
Journal Front Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 2024 Apr 24
PMID 38655137
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

FLASH-radiotherapy delivers a radiation beam a thousand times faster compared to conventional radiotherapy, reducing radiation damage in healthy tissues with an equivalent tumor response. Although not completely understood, this radiobiological phenomenon has been proved in several animal models with a spectrum of all kinds of particles currently used in contemporary radiotherapy, especially electrons. However, all the research teams have performed FLASH preclinical studies using industrial linear accelerator or LINAC commonly employed in conventional radiotherapy and modified for the delivery of ultra-high-dose-rate (UHDRs). Unfortunately, the delivering and measuring of UHDR beams have been proved not to be completely reliable with such devices. Concerns arise regarding the accuracy of beam monitoring and dosimetry systems. Additionally, this LINAC totally lacks an integrated and dedicated Treatment Planning System (TPS) able to evaluate the internal dose distribution in the case of in vivo experiments. Finally, these devices cannot modify dose-time parameters of the beam relevant to the flash effect, such as average dose rate; dose per pulse; and instantaneous dose rate. This aspect also precludes the exploration of the quantitative relationship with biological phenomena. The dependence on these parameters need to be further investigated. A promising advancement is represented by a new generation of electron LINAC that has successfully overcome some of these technological challenges. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive summary of the existing literature on in vivo experiments using electron FLASH radiotherapy and explore the promising clinical perspectives associated with this technology.

Citing Articles

FLASH Radiotherapy: Mechanisms of Biological Effects and the Therapeutic Potential in Cancer.

Yan O, Wang S, Wang Q, Wang X Biomolecules. 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 39062469 PMC: 11275005. DOI: 10.3390/biom14070754.

References
1.
Soto L, Casey K, Wang J, Blaney A, Manjappa R, Breitkreutz D . FLASH Irradiation Results in Reduced Severe Skin Toxicity Compared to Conventional-Dose-Rate Irradiation. Radiat Res. 2020; 194(6):618-624. PMC: 7855987. DOI: 10.1667/RADE-20-00090. View

2.
Biete A, Oses G . Intraoperative radiation therapy in uterine cervical cancer: A review. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2018; 23(6):589-594. PMC: 6277506. DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2018.07.005. View

3.
Konradsson E, Arendt M, Bastholm Jensen K, Borresen B, Hansen A, Back S . Establishment and Initial Experience of Clinical FLASH Radiotherapy in Canine Cancer Patients. Front Oncol. 2021; 11:658004. PMC: 8155542. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.658004. View

4.
Alyea E, Neuberg D, Mauch P, Marcus K, FREEDMAN A, Webb I . Effect of total body irradiation dose escalation on outcome following T-cell-depleted allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2002; 8(3):139-44. DOI: 10.1053/bbmt.2002.v8.pm11939603. View

5.
Wilson J, Hammond E, Higgins G, Petersson K . Ultra-High Dose Rate (FLASH) Radiotherapy: Silver Bullet or Fool's Gold?. Front Oncol. 2020; 9:1563. PMC: 6979639. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01563. View