» Articles » PMID: 38652368

Biologic Augmentation of Isolated Meniscal Repair

Overview
Date 2024 Apr 23
PMID 38652368
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose Of Review: The limited blood supply and intrinsic healing capacity of the meniscus contributes to suboptimal tissue regeneration following injury and surgical repair. Biologic augmentation techniques have been utilized in combination with isolated meniscal repair to improve tissue regeneration. Several innovative strategies such as Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP), fibrin clots, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), bone marrow stimulation, meniscal scaffolds, and meniscal wrapping, are being explored to enhance repair outcomes. This article provides a comprehensive review of recent findings and conclusions regarding biologic augmentation techniques.

Recent Findings: Studies on PRP reveal mixed outcomes, with some suggesting benefits in reducing failure rates of isolated meniscal repair, while others question its efficacy. Fibrin clots and PRF (Platelet-rich fibrin), although promising, show inconsistent results and lack sufficient evidence for definitive conclusions. MSCs demonstrate potential in preclinical studies, but clinical trials have been limited and inconclusive. Bone marrow stimulation appears effective in certain contexts, but its broader applicability remains uncertain. Meniscal scaffolds, including CMI (Collagen Meniscal Implants) and Actifit (polyurethane scaffolds), show encouraging short- and mid-term outcomes but have not consistently surpassed traditional methods in the long term. Meniscal wrapping is infrequently studied but demonstrates positive short-term results with certain applications. The review reveals a diverse range of outcomes for biologic augmentation in meniscal repair. While certain techniques show promise, particularly in specific scenarios, the overall efficacy of these methods has yet to reach a consensus. The review underscores the necessity for standardized, high-quality research to establish the definitive effectiveness of these biologic augmentation methods.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in meniscal repair surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Utrilla G, Degano I, DAmbrosi R J Orthop Traumatol. 2024; 25(1):63.

PMID: 39694969 PMC: 11656006. DOI: 10.1186/s10195-024-00799-7.


How to Improve Meniscal Repair through Biological Augmentation: A Narrative Review.

Za P, Ambrosio L, Vasta S, Russo F, Papalia G, Vadala G J Clin Med. 2024; 13(16).

PMID: 39200829 PMC: 11355678. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164688.

References
1.
Kean Ann Phua S, Tham S, Ho S . Does laterality matter? a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and survival outcomes of medial versus lateral meniscal scaffolds. Knee. 2022; 40:227-237. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2022.11.020. View

2.
Otsuki S, Sezaki S, Okamoto Y, Ishitani T, Wakama H, Neo M . Safety and Efficacy of a Novel Polyglycolic Acid Meniscal Scaffold for Irreparable Meniscal Tear. Cartilage. 2023; 15(2):110-119. PMC: 11368900. DOI: 10.1177/19476035231193087. View

3.
Otsuki S, Ikeda K, Tanaka K, Okamoto Y, Sezaki S, Neo M . Implantation of Novel Meniscus Scaffold for Irreparable Meniscal Tear. Arthrosc Tech. 2022; 11(5):e775-e779. PMC: 9134103. DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2021.12.036. View

4.
Sekiya I, Koga H, Otabe K, Nakagawa Y, Katano H, Ozeki N . Additional Use of Synovial Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation Following Surgical Repair of a Complex Degenerative Tear of the Medial Meniscus of the Knee: A Case Report. Cell Transplant. 2019; 28(11):1445-1454. PMC: 6802148. DOI: 10.1177/0963689719863793. View

5.
Bailey L, Weldon M, Kleihege J, Lauck K, Syed M, Mascarenhas R . Platelet-Rich Plasma Augmentation of Meniscal Repair in the Setting of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2021; 49(12):3287-3292. DOI: 10.1177/03635465211036471. View