» Articles » PMID: 38651937

Molecular Classification and Intratumoral Heterogeneity of Gastric Adenocarcinoma

Overview
Journal Pathol Int
Specialty Pathology
Date 2024 Apr 23
PMID 38651937
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Gastric cancers frequently harbor striking histological complexity and diversity between lesions as well as within single lesions, known as inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity, respectively. The latest World Health Organization Classification of Tumors designated more than 30 histological subtypes for gastric epithelial tumors, assigning 12 subtypes for gastric adenocarcinoma (GAD). Meanwhile, recent advances in genome-wide analyses have provided molecular aspects to the histological classification of GAD, and consequently revealed different molecular traits underlying these histological subtypes. Moreover, accumulating knowledge of comprehensive molecular profiles has led to establishing molecular classifications of GAD, which are often associated with clinical biomarkers for therapeutics and prognosis. However, most of our knowledge of GAD molecular profiles is based on inter-tumoral heterogeneity, and the molecular profiles underlying intratumoral heterogeneity are yet to be determined. In this review, recently established molecular classifications of GAD are introduced in the aspect of pathological diagnosis and are discussed in the context of intratumoral heterogeneity.

Citing Articles

Spatial and Temporal Tumor Heterogeneity in Gastric Cancer: Discordance of Predictive Biomarkers.

Lee H J Gastric Cancer. 2025; 25(1):192-209.

PMID: 39822175 PMC: 11739643. DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2025.25.e3.


Molecular classification and intratumoral heterogeneity of gastric adenocarcinoma.

Kuwata T Pathol Int. 2024; 74(6):301-316.

PMID: 38651937 PMC: 11551831. DOI: 10.1111/pin.13427.

References
1.
Bang Y, Van Cutsem E, Feyereislova A, Chung H, Shen L, Sawaki A . Trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (ToGA): a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2010; 376(9742):687-97. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61121-X. View

2.
Bartley A, Washington M, Colasacco C, Ventura C, Ismaila N, Benson 3rd A . HER2 Testing and Clinical Decision Making in Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 35(4):446-464. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.4836. View

3.
Mathiak M, Warneke V, Behrens H, Haag J, Boger C, Kruger S . Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Microsatellite Instable Gastric Carcinomas Revisited: Urgent Need for Standardization. Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2015; 25(1):12-24. PMC: 5147042. DOI: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000264. View

4.
Choi Y, Bae J, An J, Kwon I, Cho I, Shin H . Is microsatellite instability a prognostic marker in gastric cancer? A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol. 2014; 110(2):129-35. DOI: 10.1002/jso.23618. View

5.
Hofmann M, Stoss O, Shi D, Buttner R, van de Vijver M, Kim W . Assessment of a HER2 scoring system for gastric cancer: results from a validation study. Histopathology. 2008; 52(7):797-805. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2008.03028.x. View