Tools for Measuring Photosynthesis at Different Scales

Overview

Journal Methods Mol Biol

Specialty Molecular Biology

Date 2024 Apr 22

PMID 38649563

Authors

Berkley J Walker

Steven M Driever

Johannes Kromdijk

Tracy Lawson

Florian A Busch

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Measurements of in vivo photosynthesis are powerful tools that probe the largest fluxes of carbon and energy in an illuminated leaf, but often the specific techniques used are so varied and specialized that it is difficult for researchers outside the field to select and perform the most useful assays for their research questions. The goal of this chapter is to provide a broad overview of the current tools available for the study of photosynthesis, both in vivo and in vitro, so as to provide a foundation for selecting appropriate techniques, many of which are presented in detail in subsequent chapters. This chapter will also organize current methods into a comparative framework and provide examples of how they have been applied to research questions of broad agronomical, ecological, or biological importance. This chapter closes with an argument that the future of in vivo measurements of photosynthesis lies in the ability to use multiple methods simultaneously and discusses the benefits of this approach to currently open physiological questions. This chapter, combined with the relevant methods chapters, could serve as a laboratory course in methods in photosynthesis research or as part of a more comprehensive laboratory course in general plant physiology methods.

References

Yin X, Struik P . Can increased leaf photosynthesis be converted into higher crop mass production? A simulation study for rice using the crop model GECROS. J Exp Bot. 2017; 68(9):2345-2360. PMC: 5447886. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erx085. View

Galmes J, Hermida-Carrera C, Laanisto L, Niinemets U . A compendium of temperature responses of Rubisco kinetic traits: variability among and within photosynthetic groups and impacts on photosynthesis modeling. J Exp Bot. 2016; 67(17):5067-91. PMC: 5014154. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erw267. View

Hermida-Carrera C, Kapralov M, Galmes J . Rubisco Catalytic Properties and Temperature Response in Crops. Plant Physiol. 2016; 171(4):2549-61. PMC: 4972260. DOI: 10.1104/pp.16.01846. View

Orr D, Alcantara A, Kapralov M, Andralojc P, Carmo-Silva E, Parry M . Surveying Rubisco Diversity and Temperature Response to Improve Crop Photosynthetic Efficiency. Plant Physiol. 2016; 172(2):707-717. PMC: 5047088. DOI: 10.1104/pp.16.00750. View

Sharwood R, Ghannoum O, Kapralov M, Gunn L, Whitney S . Temperature responses of Rubisco from Paniceae grasses provide opportunities for improving C photosynthesis. Nat Plants. 2016; 2:16186. DOI: 10.1038/nplants.2016.186. View

Gu J, Yin X, Stomph T, Wang H, Struik P . Physiological basis of genetic variation in leaf photosynthesis among rice (Oryza sativa L.) introgression lines under drought and well-watered conditions. J Exp Bot. 2012; 63(14):5137-53. PMC: 3430991. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ers170. View

Sun J, Sun J, Feng Z . Modelling photosynthesis in flag leaves of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) considering the variation in photosynthesis parameters during development. Funct Plant Biol. 2020; 42(11):1036-1044. DOI: 10.1071/FP15140. View

Farquhar G, von Caemmerer S, Berry J . A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C 3 species. Planta. 2013; 149(1):78-90. DOI: 10.1007/BF00386231. View

Harley P, Sharkey T . An improved model of C3 photosynthesis at high CO2: Reversed O 2 sensitivity explained by lack of glycerate reentry into the chloroplast. Photosynth Res. 2014; 27(3):169-78. DOI: 10.1007/BF00035838. View

10.

Walker B, Ariza L, Kaines S, Badger M, Cousins A . Temperature response of in vivo Rubisco kinetics and mesophyll conductance in Arabidopsis thaliana: comparisons to Nicotiana tabacum. Plant Cell Environ. 2013; 36(12):2108-19. DOI: 10.1111/pce.12166. View

11.

Wall S, Vialet-Chabrand S, Davey P, Van Rie J, Galle A, Cockram J . Stomata on the abaxial and adaxial leaf surfaces contribute differently to leaf gas exchange and photosynthesis in wheat. New Phytol. 2022; 235(5):1743-1756. PMC: 9545378. DOI: 10.1111/nph.18257. View

12.

Boyer J . Turgor and the transport of CO2 and water across the cuticle (epidermis) of leaves. J Exp Bot. 2015; 66(9):2625-33. PMC: 4672191. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erv065. View

13.

Marquez D, Stuart-Williams H, Farquhar G . An improved theory for calculating leaf gas exchange more precisely accounting for small fluxes. Nat Plants. 2021; 7(3):317-326. DOI: 10.1038/s41477-021-00861-w. View

14.

Marquez D, Stuart-Williams H, Farquhar G, Busch F . Cuticular conductance of adaxial and abaxial leaf surfaces and its relation to minimum leaf surface conductance. New Phytol. 2021; 233(1):156-168. DOI: 10.1111/nph.17588. View

15.

Marquez D, Stuart-Williams H, Cernusak L, Farquhar G . Assessing the CO concentration at the surface of photosynthetic mesophyll cells. New Phytol. 2023; 238(4):1446-1460. DOI: 10.1111/nph.18784. View

16.

Busch F, Sage T, Cousins A, Sage R . C3 plants enhance rates of photosynthesis by reassimilating photorespired and respired CO2. Plant Cell Environ. 2012; 36(1):200-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02567.x. View

17.

Ma F, Jazmin L, Young J, Allen D . Isotopically nonstationary 13C flux analysis of changes in Arabidopsis thaliana leaf metabolism due to high light acclimation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014; 111(47):16967-72. PMC: 4250135. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1319485111. View

18.

Busch F, Sage R, Farquhar G . Plants increase CO uptake by assimilating nitrogen via the photorespiratory pathway. Nat Plants. 2017; 4(1):46-54. DOI: 10.1038/s41477-017-0065-x. View

19.

Abadie C, Boex-Fontvieille E, Carroll A, Tcherkez G . In vivo stoichiometry of photorespiratory metabolism. Nat Plants. 2016; 2:15220. DOI: 10.1038/nplants.2015.220. View

20.

Lawson T, Milliken A . Photosynthesis - beyond the leaf. New Phytol. 2022; 238(1):55-61. PMC: 10953325. DOI: 10.1111/nph.18671. View