» Articles » PMID: 38647035

Sex Classification from Functional Brain Connectivity: Generalization to Multiple Datasets

Overview
Journal Hum Brain Mapp
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Neurology
Date 2024 Apr 22
PMID 38647035
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Machine learning (ML) approaches are increasingly being applied to neuroimaging data. Studies in neuroscience typically have to rely on a limited set of training data which may impair the generalizability of ML models. However, it is still unclear which kind of training sample is best suited to optimize generalization performance. In the present study, we systematically investigated the generalization performance of sex classification models trained on the parcelwise connectivity profile of either single samples or compound samples of two different sizes. Generalization performance was quantified in terms of mean across-sample classification accuracy and spatial consistency of accurately classifying parcels. Our results indicate that the generalization performance of parcelwise classifiers (pwCs) trained on single dataset samples is dependent on the specific test samples. Certain datasets seem to "match" in the sense that classifiers trained on a sample from one dataset achieved a high accuracy when tested on the respected other one and vice versa. The pwCs trained on the compound samples demonstrated overall highest generalization performance for all test samples, including one derived from a dataset not included in building the training samples. Thus, our results indicate that both a large sample size and a heterogeneous data composition of a training sample have a central role in achieving generalizable results.

Citing Articles

Sex classification from functional brain connectivity: Generalization to multiple datasets.

Wiersch L, Friedrich P, Hamdan S, Komeyer V, Hoffstaedter F, Patil K Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(6):e26683.

PMID: 38647035 PMC: 11034006. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26683.

References
1.
Carp J . On the plurality of (methodological) worlds: estimating the analytic flexibility of FMRI experiments. Front Neurosci. 2012; 6:149. PMC: 3468892. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2012.00149. View

2.
Kohoutova L, Heo J, Cha S, Lee S, Moon T, Wager T . Toward a unified framework for interpreting machine-learning models in neuroimaging. Nat Protoc. 2020; 15(4):1399-1435. PMC: 9533325. DOI: 10.1038/s41596-019-0289-5. View

3.
Chang K, Balachandar N, Lam C, Yi D, Brown J, Beers A . Distributed deep learning networks among institutions for medical imaging. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018; 25(8):945-954. PMC: 6077811. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocy017. View

4.
Sripada C, Angstadt M, Taxali A, Clark D, Greathouse T, Rutherford S . Brain-wide functional connectivity patterns support general cognitive ability and mediate effects of socioeconomic status in youth. Transl Psychiatry. 2021; 11(1):571. PMC: 8575890. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-021-01704-0. View

5.
Fan L, Li H, Zhuo J, Zhang Y, Wang J, Chen L . The Human Brainnetome Atlas: A New Brain Atlas Based on Connectional Architecture. Cereb Cortex. 2016; 26(8):3508-26. PMC: 4961028. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhw157. View