» Articles » PMID: 38643313

Haemostatic Gene Variations in Cervical Cancer-associated Venous Thrombosis: Considerations for Clinical Strategies

Overview
Date 2024 Apr 20
PMID 38643313
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a life-threatening haemostatic disease frequently diagnosed among the cancer population. The Khorana Score is currently the primal risk assessment model to stratify oncological patients according to their susceptibility to VTE, however, it displays a limited performance. Meanwhile, intensive research on VTE pathophysiology in the general population has uncovered a range of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with the condition. Nonetheless, their predictive ability concerning cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is controversial. Cervical cancer (CC) patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy often experience VTE, which negatively affects their survival. Thus, aiming for an improvement in thromboprophylaxis, new thrombotic biomarkers, including SNPs, are currently under investigation. In this study, the predictive capability of haemostatic gene SNPs on CC-related VTE and their prognostic value regardless of VTE were explored. Six SNPs in haemostatic genes were evaluated. A total of 401 CC patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy were enrolled in a retrospective cohort study. The implications for the time to VTE occurrence and overall survival (OS) were assessed. CAT considerably impacted the CC patients' OS (log-rank test, P < 0.001). SERPINE1 rs2070682 (T > C) showed a significant association with the risk of CC-related VTE (CC/CT vs. TT, log-rank test, P = 0.002; C allele, Cox model, hazard ratio (HR) = 6.99 and P = 0.009), while F2 rs1799963 (G > A) demonstrated an important prognostic value regardless of VTE (AA/AG vs. GG, log-rank test, P = 0.020; A allele, Cox model, HR = 2.76 and P = 0.026). For the remaining SNPs, no significant associations were detected. The polymorphisms SERPINE1 rs2070682 and F2 rs1799963 could be valuable tools in clinical decision-making, aiding in thromboprophylaxis and CC management, respectively.

Citing Articles

Development of a thrombin-antithrombin complex detection kit and study in venous thromboembolism complicated by cervical cancer.

Qiu Y, Han S, Ji Y, Lu Z, Huang X BMC Biotechnol. 2024; 24(1):103.

PMID: 39696289 PMC: 11653829. DOI: 10.1186/s12896-024-00930-w.


Haemostatic Gene Expression in Cancer-Related Immunothrombosis: Contribution for Venous Thromboembolism and Ovarian Tumour Behaviour.

Tavares V, Savva-Bordalo J, Rei M, Liz-Pimenta J, Assis J, Pereira D Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(13).

PMID: 39001418 PMC: 11240748. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132356.

References
1.
Tavares V, Pinto R, Assis J, Coelho S, Brandao M, Alves S . Implications of venous thromboembolism GWAS reported genetic makeup in the clinical outcome of ovarian cancer patients. Pharmacogenomics J. 2020; 21(2):222-232. DOI: 10.1038/s41397-020-00201-9. View

2.
Heit J, Spencer F, White R . The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016; 41(1):3-14. PMC: 4715842. DOI: 10.1007/s11239-015-1311-6. View

3.
Lim W, Le Gal G, Bates S, Righini M, Haramati L, Lang E . American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Blood Adv. 2018; 2(22):3226-3256. PMC: 6258916. DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018024828. View

4.
Satoh T, Matsumoto K, Tanaka Y, Akiyama A, Nakao S, Sakurai M . Incidence of venous thromboembolism before treatment in cervical cancer and the impact of management on venous thromboembolism after commencement of treatment. Thromb Res. 2013; 131(4):e127-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2013.01.027. View

5.
Neto B, Tavares V, Brito da Silva J, Liz-Pimenta J, Marques I, Carvalho L . Thrombogenesis-associated genetic determinants as predictors of thromboembolism and prognosis in cervical cancer. Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):9519. PMC: 10260924. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-36161-w. View