Prognostic Performance of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cervical Cancer Staging Guidelines
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: To examine the prognostic performance of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) cervical cancer staging schema.
Methods: We used the National Cancer Database to identify women with cervical cancer diagnosed from 2004 to 2015. Using clinical and pathologic data, each patient's stage was classified using three staging schemas: American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition, FIGO 2009 and FIGO 2018. The FIGO 2018 revised staging classifies stage IB tumors into three substages based on tumor size (IB1-IB3) and classifies patients with positive lymph nodes (pathologically or clinically detected) as stage IIIC1 (positive pelvic nodes) or IIIC2 (positive para-aortic nodes). Five-year survival rates were estimated for each stage grouping. We sought to determine whether the 2018 FIGO staging system was able to offer improved 5-year survival rate differentiation compared with older staging schemas.
Results: A total of 62,212 women were identified. The classification of stage IB tumors into three substages improved discriminatory ability. Five-year survival in the FIGO 2018 schema was 91.6% (95% CI 90.4-92.6%) for stage IB1 tumors, 83.3% (95% CI 81.8-84.8%) for stage IB2 neoplasms, and 76.1% (95% CI 74.3-77.8%) for IB3 lesions. In contrast, for women with stage III tumors, higher FIGO staging was not consistently associated with worse 5-year survival rates: stage IIIA (40.7%, 95 CI 37.1-44.3%), stage IIIB (41.4%; 95% CI 39.9-42.9%), stage IIIC1 (positive pelvic nodes) was 60.8% (95% CI 58.7-62.8%) and stage IIIC2 37.5% (95% CI 33.3-41.7%).
Conclusion: The FIGO 2018 staging schema provides improved discriminatory ability for women with stage IB tumors; however, classification of all women with positive lymph nodes into a single stage results in a very heterogeneous group of patients with highly variable survival rates.
Tumor ADC value predicts outcome and yields refined prognostication in uterine cervical cancer.
Lura N, Wagner-Larsen K, Ryste S, Fasmer K, Forsse D, Trovik J Cancer Imaging. 2025; 25(1):23.
PMID: 40022269 PMC: 11871606. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-025-00828-6.
Li Y, Wang X, Li Y, Li W, Liu D, Guo L Cancer Med. 2025; 14(3):e70650.
PMID: 39912427 PMC: 11800136. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70650.
Cheung E, Wu P Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(2).
PMID: 39857985 PMC: 11764200. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17020202.
Hamada K, Yamanoi K, Hayashi N, Kotani Y, Matsumoto H, Horikawa N Int J Clin Oncol. 2025; 30(3):584-592.
PMID: 39815053 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-025-02697-2.
Overexpression of C1orf74 predicts poor outcome and promote cervical cancer progression.
Zhu H, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Tian Y, Liu D, Li X Heliyon. 2025; 10(24):e40966.
PMID: 39759315 PMC: 11699247. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40966.