» Articles » PMID: 38638265

CD3ε of a Pan T Cell Marker Involved in Mouse Keratitis

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2024 Apr 19
PMID 38638265
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To explore whether CD3ε is involved in the adaptive immunity of () keratitis in mice and the role of innate and adaptive immunity in it.

Methods: Mice models of keratitis were established by intra-stromal injection and corneal epithelial scratching. Subconjunctival injections of natamycin, wedelolactone, LOX-1 inhibitor (poly I) or Dectin-1 inhibitor (laminarin) were used to treat mice with keratitis. Mice were pretreated by intraperitoneal injection of anti-mouse CD3ε. We observed the corneal infection of mice under the slit lamp microscope and made a clinical score. The protein expression of CD3ε and interleukin-10 (IL-10) was determined by Western blotting.

Results: With the disease progresses, the degree of corneal opacity and edema augmented. In the intra-stromal injection models, CD3ε protein expression began to increase significantly on the 2 day. However, in the scraping epithelial method models, CD3ε only began to increase on the 3 day. After natamycin treatment, the degree of corneal inflammation in mice was significantly attenuated on the 3 day. After wedelolactone treatment, the severity of keratitis worsened. And the amount of CD3ε protein was also reduced, compared with the control group. By inhibiting LOX-1 and Dectin-1, there was no significant difference in CD3ε production compared with the control group. After inhibiting CD3ε, corneal ulcer area and clinical score increased, and IL-10 expression was downregulated.

Conclusion: As a pan T cell marker, CD3ε participate in the adaptive immunity of keratitis in mice. In our mice models, the corneas will enter the adaptive immune stage faster. By regulating IL-10, CD3ε exerts anti-inflammatory and repairs effects in the adaptive immune stage.

Citing Articles

Dectin-1 participates in the immune-inflammatory response to mouse keratitis by modulating macrophage polarization.

Guibo L, Chunxu D, Biao C, Zhaolei H, Wenwen L, Xiangnan J Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1431633.

PMID: 39478855 PMC: 11523060. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1431633.


Immune Mechanisms of Filamentous Fungal Keratitis.

Mpakosi A, Kaliouli-Antonopoulou C Cureus. 2024; 16(6):e61954.

PMID: 38855487 PMC: 11162199. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61954.

References
1.
Retamal J, Ordenes-Cavieres G, Grau-Diez A . Natamycin versus voriconazole for fungal keratitis. Medwave. 2018; 18(8):e7388. DOI: 10.5867/medwave.2018.08.7387. View

2.
J Hoffman J, Arunga S, H A Mohamed Ahmed A, Hu V, Burton M . Management of Filamentous Fungal Keratitis: A Pragmatic Approach. J Fungi (Basel). 2022; 8(10). PMC: 9605596. DOI: 10.3390/jof8101067. View

3.
Xu Q, Wang Q, Hu L, Lin J, Jiang N, Peng X . NADPH oxidase 2 plays a protective role in experimental keratitis in mice through killing fungi and limiting the degree of inflammation. Int J Ophthalmol. 2022; 15(7):1044-1052. PMC: 9318084. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2022.07.02. View

4.
Hu J, Hu Y, Chen S, Dong C, Zhang J, Li Y . Role of activated macrophages in experimental Fusarium solani keratitis. Exp Eye Res. 2014; 129:57-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2014.10.014. View

5.
Brown L, Kamwiziku G, Oladele R, Burton M, Prajna N, Leitman T . The Case for Fungal Keratitis to Be Accepted as a Neglected Tropical Disease. J Fungi (Basel). 2022; 8(10). PMC: 9605065. DOI: 10.3390/jof8101047. View