» Articles » PMID: 38634901

Motor Unit Firing Rates Increase in Prepubescent Youth Following Linear Periodization Resistance Exercise Training

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2024 Apr 18
PMID 38634901
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose was to examine the effects of 8-weeks (3 days/week) of linear periodization resistance exercise training (RET) on neuromuscular function in prepubescent youth.

Methods: Twenty-five healthy prepubescent youth (11 males, 14 females, age = 9.1 ± 0.8 years) completed the RET (n = 17) or served as controls (CON, n = 8). Isometric maximal voluntary contractions (MVCs) and trapezoidal submaximal contractions at 35 and 60% MVC of the right leg extensors were performed with surface electromyography (EMG) recorded from the leg extensors [vastus lateralis (VL), rectus femoris, and vastus medialis] and flexors (biceps femoris and semitendinosus). EMG amplitude of the leg extensors and flexors were calculated during the MVCs. Motor unit (MU) action potential trains were decomposed from the surface EMG of the VL for the 35 and 60% MVCs. MU firing rates and action potential amplitudes were regressed against recruitment threshold with the y-intercepts and slopes calculated for each contraction. Total leg extensor muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) was collected using ultrasound images. ANOVA models were used to examine potential differences.

Results: Isometric strength increased post-RET (P = 0.006) with no changes in leg extensor and flexor EMG amplitude. Furthermore, there were no changes in total CSA or the MU action potential amplitude vs. recruitment threshold relationships. However, there were increases in the firing rates of the higher-threshold MUs post-RET as indicated with greater y-intercepts (P = 0.003) from the 60% MVC and less negative slope (P = 0.004) of the firing rates vs. recruitment threshold relationships at 35% MVC.

Conclusions: MU adaptations contribute to strength increases following RET in prepubescent youth.

References
1.
Beck T . The importance of a priori sample size estimation in strength and conditioning research. J Strength Cond Res. 2013; 27(8):2323-37. DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318278eea0. View

2.
Behm D, Faigenbaum A, Falk B, Klentrou P . Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology position paper: resistance training in children and adolescents. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2008; 33(3):547-61. DOI: 10.1139/H08-020. View

3.
Bull F, Al-Ansari S, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman M, Cardon G . World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 2020; 54(24):1451-1462. PMC: 7719906. DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102955. View

4.
Burke R, Rudomin P, Zajac 3rd F . Catch property in single mammalian motor units. Science. 1970; 168(3927):122-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.168.3927.122. View

5.
Button D, Behm D . The effect of stimulus anticipation on the interpolated twitch technique. J Sports Sci Med. 2013; 7(4):520-4. PMC: 3761925. View