» Articles » PMID: 23880657

The Importance of a Priori Sample Size Estimation in Strength and Conditioning Research

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2013 Jul 25
PMID 23880657
Citations 155
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The statistical power, or sensitivity of an experiment, is defined as the probability of rejecting a false null hypothesis. Only 3 factors can affect statistical power: (a) the significance level (α), (b) the magnitude or size of the treatment effect (effect size), and (c) the sample size (n). Of these 3 factors, only the sample size can be manipulated by the investigator because the significance level is usually selected before the study, and the effect size is determined by the effectiveness of the treatment. Thus, selection of an appropriate sample size is one of the most important components of research design but is often misunderstood by beginning researchers. The purpose of this tutorial is to describe procedures for estimating sample size for a variety of different experimental designs that are common in strength and conditioning research. Emphasis is placed on selecting an appropriate effect size because this step fully determines sample size when power and the significance level are fixed. There are many different software packages that can be used for sample size estimation. However, I chose to describe the procedures for the G*Power software package (version 3.1.4) because this software is freely downloadable and capable of estimating sample size for many of the different statistical tests used in strength and conditioning research. Furthermore, G*Power provides a number of different auxiliary features that can be useful for researchers when designing studies. It is my hope that the procedures described in this article will be beneficial for researchers in the field of strength and conditioning.

Citing Articles

Estimation of maximum lower limb muscle strength from vertical jumps.

Hou C, Hsu C, Fuchs P, Shiang T PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0316636.

PMID: 40014596 PMC: 11867321. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316636.


The effect of 12-week combined balance and plyometric training on dynamic balance and lower extremity injury risk in college dancers.

Yan Y, Seoyoung P, Seomyeong H, Zhao Y Front Physiol. 2025; 16:1501828.

PMID: 40008211 PMC: 11851013. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1501828.


The effects of circuit hydraulic weight interval training on body composition and progression of resistance in recreationally exercising pre- and postmenopausal women: an 18-week quasi-experimental study.

Socha M, Cwielag P, Andrzejewski W Front Physiol. 2025; 16:1540983.

PMID: 39995478 PMC: 11847869. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1540983.


The effects of 8 weeks of multi-directional movement training combined with balance training on the change of direction of young table tennis players.

Chen Q, Li Y, Heng X, Zhao L, Wu B Front Physiol. 2025; 16:1541639.

PMID: 39936040 PMC: 11811084. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2025.1541639.


Muscular Performance and Blood Pressure After Different Pre-Strength Training Strategies in Recreationally Strength-Trained Women: Cross-Over Trial.

Monteiro E, Pescatello L, Leitao L, de Miranda M, Marchetti P, Novaes M J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 39852285 PMC: 11765638. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd12010007.