» Articles » PMID: 38631951

COVID-19 Vaccination Communication: Effects of Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs and Message Framing Among Black and White Participants

Overview
Journal Vaccine
Date 2024 Apr 17
PMID 38631951
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The importance of vaccination in combating the COVID-19 pandemic is widely acknowledged. The aim of this study was (1) to understand how one's vaccine conspiracy beliefs would influence their public health news processing, (2) to examine how specific public health news features (i.e., news frame) would influence message processing, and (3) to examine if there were any differences between Black and White participants in their message processing.

Methods: A nationwide online experiment (N = 821) with a 3 (vaccine conspiracy beliefs: high vs. moderate vs. low) × 2 (participants' race: Black vs. White) × 2 (news frames: gain vs. loss) mixed-factorial design was conducted in the United States.

Results: Participants' level of vaccine conspiracy beliefs was predictive of their responses to outcome measures. Additionally, Black participants reported higher perceived message effectiveness, more favorable attitudes toward the message, and higher vaccination intentions than White participants. Furthermore, health news that emphasized vaccination benefits produced more favorable attitudes than those emphasizing losses associated with non-vaccination, especially for White participants. Lastly, participants reported more favorable attitudes toward gain-framed health news regardless of their vaccine conspiracy beliefs.

Conclusion: It is crucial for health officials to work to find effective media message strategies to combat COVID-19 vaccine conspiracy theories and misinformation. Furthermore, this study supports the significance of health organizations' ongoing efforts to tailor public health messaging to specific racial groups, as evidenced by considerable variations in perceptions among Black and White Americans.

Citing Articles

Perceived benefits, information, vaccination history, and conspiracy beliefs as significant determinants of RSV vaccine acceptance among Arab seniors.

Sallam M, Al-Mahzoum K, Yousef Z, Alfouzan J, Alharbi M, Alsubaiei M Ther Adv Vaccines Immunother. 2025; 13:25151355251324384.

PMID: 40027198 PMC: 11869265. DOI: 10.1177/25151355251324384.


Determining factors for COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among Brazilians: a study using structural equation modeling.

Camargo E, Sousa A, Reis A, Fortunato M, Gouveia I, Mendes I Rev Bras Enferm. 2024; 77Suppl 2(Suppl 2):e20240112.

PMID: 39230099 PMC: 11370770. DOI: 10.1590/0034-7167-2024-0112.

References
1.
Mackey K, Ayers C, Kondo K, Saha S, Advani S, Young S . Racial and Ethnic Disparities in COVID-19-Related Infections, Hospitalizations, and Deaths : A Systematic Review. Ann Intern Med. 2020; 174(3):362-373. PMC: 7772883. DOI: 10.7326/M20-6306. View

2.
Loomba S, de Figueiredo A, Piatek S, de Graaf K, Larson H . Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nat Hum Behav. 2021; 5(3):337-348. DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1. View

3.
Ogbodo J, Onwe E, Chukwu J, Nwasum C, Nwakpu E, Nwankwo S . Communicating health crisis: a content analysis of global media framing of COVID-19. Health Promot Perspect. 2020; 10(3):257-269. PMC: 7420175. DOI: 10.34172/hpp.2020.40. View

4.
Shahi G, Dirkson A, Majchrzak T . An exploratory study of COVID-19 misinformation on Twitter. Online Soc Netw Media. 2021; 22:100104. PMC: 7893249. DOI: 10.1016/j.osnem.2020.100104. View

5.
Xiang H, Li Y, Guo Y . Promoting COVID-19 booster vaccines in Macao: A psychological reactance perspective. Soc Sci Med. 2023; 332:116128. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116128. View