» Articles » PMID: 38618232

Diverse Material Properties and Morphology of Moth Proboscises Relates to the Feeding Habits of Some Macromoth and Other Lepidopteran Lineages

Overview
Journal Interface Focus
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Apr 15
PMID 38618232
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Insects have evolved unique structures that host a diversity of material and mechanical properties, and the mouthparts (proboscis) of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera) are no exception. Here, we examined proboscis morphology and material properties from several previously unstudied moth lineages to determine if they relate to flower visiting and non-flower visiting feeding habits. Scanning electron microscopy and three-dimensional imaging were used to study proboscis morphology and assess surface roughness patterns on the galeal surface, respectively. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was used to study patterns of cuticular autofluorescence, which was quantified with colour analysis software. We found that moth proboscises display similar autofluorescent signals and morphological patterns in relation to feeding habits to those previously described for flower and non-flower visiting butterflies. The distal region of proboscises of non-flower visitors is brush-like for augmented capillarity and exhibited blue autofluorescence, indicating the possible presence of resilin and increased flexibility. Flower visitors have smoother proboscises and show red autofluorescence, an indicator of high sclerotization, which is adaptive for floral tube entry. We propose the lepidopteran proboscis as a model structure for understanding how insects have evolved a suite of morphological and material adaptations to overcome the challenges of acquiring fluids from diverse sources.

Citing Articles

Scanning Electron Microscopy of the Proboscis and Associated Sensilla in (Esper, 1805) (Lepidoptera: Pieridae).

Yuan J, Li F, Zhu L, Zhang W, Ma L, Miao Y Insects. 2025; 15(12.

PMID: 39769524 PMC: 11677731. DOI: 10.3390/insects15120922.


Diverse material properties and morphology of moth proboscises relates to the feeding habits of some macromoth and other lepidopteran lineages.

Bast E, Marshall N, Myers K, Marsh L, Hurtado M, Van Zandt P Interface Focus. 2024; 14(2):20230051.

PMID: 38618232 PMC: 11008959. DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2023.0051.

References
1.
Labandeira C, Yang Q, Santiago-Blay J, Hotton C, Monteiro A, Wang Y . The evolutionary convergence of mid-Mesozoic lacewings and Cenozoic butterflies. Proc Biol Sci. 2016; 283(1824). PMC: 4760178. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2893. View

2.
Michels J, Gorb S . Detailed three-dimensional visualization of resilin in the exoskeleton of arthropods using confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Microsc. 2011; 245(1):1-16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2011.03523.x. View

3.
Batelka J, Prokop J . The earliest beetle with mouthparts specialized for feeding on nectar is a parasitoid of mid-Cretaceous Hymenoptera. BMC Ecol Evol. 2021; 21(1):207. PMC: 8607574. DOI: 10.1186/s12862-021-01930-6. View

4.
Lehnert M, Monaenkova D, Andrukh T, Beard C, Adler P, Kornev K . Hydrophobic-hydrophilic dichotomy of the butterfly proboscis. J R Soc Interface. 2013; 10(85):20130336. PMC: 4043169. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0336. View

5.
Zhang C, Beard C, Adler P, Kornev K . Effect of curvature on wetting and dewetting of proboscises of butterflies and moths. R Soc Open Sci. 2018; 5(1):171241. PMC: 5792911. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.171241. View