» Articles » PMID: 35971041

SCOPE: The South Carolina Psycholinguistic Metabase

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2022 Aug 15
PMID 35971041
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The number of databases that provide various measurements of lexical properties for psycholinguistic research has increased rapidly in recent years. The proliferation of lexical variables, and the multitude of associated databases, makes the choice, comparison, and standardization of these variables in psycholinguistic research increasingly difficult. Here, we introduce The South Carolina Psycholinguistic Metabase (SCOPE), which is a metabase (or a meta-database) containing an extensive, curated collection of psycholinguistic variable values from major databases. The metabase currently contains 245 lexical variables, organized into seven major categories: General (e.g., frequency), Orthographic (e.g., bigram frequency), Phonological (e.g., phonological uniqueness point), Orth-Phon (e.g., consistency), Semantic (e.g., concreteness), Morphological (e.g., number of morphemes), and Response variables (e.g., lexical decision latency). We hope that SCOPE will become a valuable resource for researchers in psycholinguistics and affiliated disciplines such as cognitive neuroscience of language, computational linguistics, and communication disorders. The availability and ease of use of the metabase with comprehensive set of variables can facilitate the understanding of the unique contribution of each of the variables to word processing, and that of interactions between variables, as well as new insights and development of improved models and theories of word processing. It can also help standardize practice in psycholinguistics. We demonstrate use of the metabase by measuring relationships between variables in multiple ways and testing their individual contribution towards a number of dependent measures, in the most comprehensive analysis of this kind to date. The metabase is freely available at go.sc.edu/scope.

Citing Articles

The acceptability and validity of AI-generated psycholinguistic stimuli.

Alzahrani A Heliyon. 2025; 11(2):e42083.

PMID: 39906842 PMC: 11791230. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e42083.


Vigorous Exercise Enhances Verbal Fluency Performance in Healthy Young Adults.

Khanna M, Guenther C, Eckerson J, Talamante D, Yeh M, Forby M Brain Sci. 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39851463 PMC: 11763765. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci15010096.


Mapping Mental Representations With Free Associations: A Tutorial Using the R Package associatoR.

Aeschbach S, Mata R, Wulff D J Cogn. 2025; 8(1):3.

PMID: 39803181 PMC: 11720478. DOI: 10.5334/joc.407.


Moving beyond word frequency based on tally counting: AI-generated familiarity estimates of words and phrases are an interesting additional index of language knowledge.

Brysbaert M, Martinez G, Reviriego P Behav Res Methods. 2024; 57(1):28.

PMID: 39733132 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02561-7.


Using large language models to estimate features of multi-word expressions: Concreteness, valence, arousal.

Martinez G, Molero J, Gonzalez S, Conde J, Brysbaert M, Reviriego P Behav Res Methods. 2024; 57(1):5.

PMID: 39633225 DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02515-z.


References
1.
Adelman J, Brown G, Quesada J . Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychol Sci. 2006; 17(9):814-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01787.x. View

2.
Balota D, Yap M, Cortese M, Hutchison K, Kessler B, Loftis B . The English Lexicon Project. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39(3):445-59. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193014. View

3.
Binder J, Conant L, Humphries C, Fernandino L, Simons S, Aguilar M . Toward a brain-based componential semantic representation. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2016; 33(3-4):130-74. DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2016.1147426. View

4.
Brysbaert M, New B . Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behav Res Methods. 2009; 41(4):977-90. DOI: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977. View

5.
Brysbaert M, New B, Keuleers E . Adding part-of-speech information to the SUBTLEX-US word frequencies. Behav Res Methods. 2012; 44(4):991-7. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-012-0190-4. View