Movements After Captive Bolt Stunning in Cattle and Possible Animal- and Process-Related Impact Factors-A Field Study

Overview

Journal Animals (Basel)

Date 2024 Apr 13

PMID 38612350

Authors

Anika Lucking

Helen Louton

Martin von Wenzlawowicz

Michael Erhard

Karen von Holleben

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Movements in cattle after captive bolt stunning cause problems in the slaughter process and lead to uncertainties in assessing stunning effectiveness. The objective of this study was to categorize and quantify these movements and determine animal- and process-related impact factors, as well as connections to stunning effectiveness and shooting position. In total 2911 cows, heifers, and bulls (dairy, beef, and crossbreeds) were examined (mean age 3.02 years). Movements from landing until at least four minutes after sticking were recorded by action cams (Apeman A100). Nine movement categories were defined ("kicking hind limb", "twitching", "bending and stretching hind limb", "lifting and bending forelimb", "body arching laterally", "body arching ventrally", and "arching backwards"). According to the movement severity, a score was assigned to each category. The scores were summed, either for certain process intervals, e.g., LANDING (ejection from the stunning box), HOISTING, or STICKING, or for the total time between LANDING and end of the FOURTH MINUTE OF BLEEDING (sum score). Statistical analysis (ANOVA) was performed on the scores. Only 6.6% of cattle showed no movement. Most movements occurred during STICKING and FIRST MINUTE OF BLEEDING, occurring rarely up to 8 min after sticking. While cows moved most at LANDING, bulls and heifers moved more if all process intervals were considered. The sum score was highest in German Angus, Charolais, and Limousin and lowest in Brown Swiss and Simmental. The score at LANDING was highest in German Angus and Black Holstein. The use of pneumatic stunners and an increase in bolt-exit length significantly reduced movements. No impact of stunning effectiveness on movements was found, but only 19 cattle showed reduced effectiveness.

Citing Articles

Commentary: A Comparison of the Methods of the Pre-Slaughter Stunning of Cattle in Australia-Mechanical, Electrical, and Diathermic Syncope.

Musk G, Johnson C Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(21).

PMID: 39518864 PMC: 11545014. DOI: 10.3390/ani14213141.

References

Martin M, Kline H, Wagner D, Alexander L, Edwards-Callaway L, Grandin T . Evaluation of different captive bolt lengths and breed influence upon post-stun hind limb and forelimb activity in fed cattle at a commercial slaughter facility. Meat Sci. 2018; 143:159-164. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.05.003. View

Gregory N, Lee C, Widdicombe J . Depth of concussion in cattle shot by penetrating captive bolt. Meat Sci. 2011; 77(4):499-503. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.04.026. View

Terlouw C, Bourguet C, Deiss V . Consciousness, unconsciousness and death in the context of slaughter. Part I. Neurobiological mechanisms underlying stunning and killing. Meat Sci. 2016; 118:133-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.03.011. View

Gibson T, Mason C, Spence J, Barker H, Gregory N . Factors affecting penetrating captive bolt gun performance. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2014; 18(3):222-38. DOI: 10.1080/10888705.2014.980579. View

Terlouw E, Bourguet C, Deiss V, Mallet C . Origins of movements following stunning and during bleeding in cattle. Meat Sci. 2015; 110:135-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2015.07.010. View

Grandin T, Velarde A, Strappini A, Gerritzen M, Ghezzi M, Martinez-Burnes J . Slaughtering of Water Buffalo () with and without Stunning: A Focus on the Neurobiology of Pain, Hyperalgesia, and Sensitization. Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(15). PMC: 10417361. DOI: 10.3390/ani13152406. View

Gibson T, Oliveira S, Dalla Costa F, Gregory N . Electroencephalographic assessment of pneumatically powered penetrating and non-penetrating captive-bolt stunning of bulls. Meat Sci. 2019; 151:54-59. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.01.006. View

Kline H, Wagner D, Edwards-Callaway L, Alexander L, Grandin T . Effect of captive bolt gun length on brain trauma and post-stunning hind limb activity in finished cattle Bos taurus. Meat Sci. 2019; 155:69-73. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.05.004. View

McKinstry J, Anil M . The effect of repeat application of electrical stunning on the welfare of pigs. Meat Sci. 2011; 67(1):121-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2003.10.002. View

10.

Grillner S, Wallen P, Saitoh K, Kozlov A, Robertson B . Neural bases of goal-directed locomotion in vertebrates--an overview. Brain Res Rev. 2007; 57(1):2-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.06.027. View

11.

Grist A, Lines J, Bock R, Knowles T, Wotton S . An Examination of the Performance of Blank Cartridges Used in Captive Bolt Devices for the Pre-Slaughter Stunning and Euthanasia of Animals. Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(8). PMC: 6720873. DOI: 10.3390/ani9080552. View

12.

Terlouw C, Bourguet C, Deiss V . Consciousness, unconsciousness and death in the context of slaughter. Part II. Evaluation methods. Meat Sci. 2016; 118:147-56. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.03.010. View