» Articles » PMID: 31416152

An Examination of the Performance of Blank Cartridges Used in Captive Bolt Devices for the Pre-Slaughter Stunning and Euthanasia of Animals

Overview
Journal Animals (Basel)
Date 2019 Aug 17
PMID 31416152
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Blank cartridges provide the power source for the majority of captive bolt devices used for rendering animals unconscious prior to slaughter within the United Kingdom or euthanasia worldwide. This paper presents the results of the examination of cartridges as one of the variables that can contribute to an unsuccessful application of this method in practice. Variation was found in cartridge weight, propellant fill volume and velocity within boxes of 1000 cartridges. The variation found was greater in lower charge (1.00 grain) cartridges than in 3.00 grain cartridges, however velocity was found to be variable in both sets. For example, in vivo velocity measurements with 0.25″ calibre 3.00 grain cartridges demonstrated an average velocity of 50.8 m/s over 200 shots with a range of 35.7 to 62.9 m/s when used in the same device. This work demonstrates that variation in cartridge performance does occur and can be due to various factors such as fill volume and propellant function, and simply weighing cartridges cannot be used to determine function, therefore cartridge performance must be a factor that is considered in the event of a miss-stun.

Citing Articles

Movements after Captive Bolt Stunning in Cattle and Possible Animal- and Process-Related Impact Factors-A Field Study.

Lucking A, Louton H, von Wenzlawowicz M, Erhard M, von Holleben K Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 38612350 PMC: 11010814. DOI: 10.3390/ani14071112.


A Case of Multiple Stun Attempts in a Bovine Due to Chronic Disease Process Causing Cranial Abnormalities.

Grist A, Wotton S Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(1).

PMID: 33429862 PMC: 7826818. DOI: 10.3390/ani11010116.


Further Examination of the Performance of Blank Cartridges Used in Captive Bolt Devices for the Pre-Slaughter Stunning of Animals.

Grist A, Bock R, Knowles T, Wotton S Animals (Basel). 2020; 10(11).

PMID: 33218032 PMC: 7698744. DOI: 10.3390/ani10112146.


Pathophysiology of Concussive Non-Penetrative Captive Bolt Stunning of Turkeys.

Gibson T, King E, Spence J, Limon G Animals (Basel). 2019; 9(12).

PMID: 31795487 PMC: 6940817. DOI: 10.3390/ani9121049.

References
1.
Raj A, OCallaghan M . Evaluation of a pneumatically operated captive bolt for stunning/killing broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci. 2001; 42(3):295-9. DOI: 10.1080/00071660120055232. View

2.
Frank M, Franke E, Philipp K, Bockholdt B, Ekkernkamp A . Ballistic parameters of cal. 9 mm x 17 mm industrial blank cartridges (cattle cartridges). Forensic Sci Int. 2009; 192(1-3):83-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.08.002. View

3.
Gregory N, Lee C, Widdicombe J . Depth of concussion in cattle shot by penetrating captive bolt. Meat Sci. 2011; 77(4):499-503. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.04.026. View

4.
Gibson T, Mason C, Spence J, Barker H, Gregory N . Factors affecting penetrating captive bolt gun performance. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2014; 18(3):222-38. DOI: 10.1080/10888705.2014.980579. View

5.
Terlouw C, Bourguet C, Deiss V . Consciousness, unconsciousness and death in the context of slaughter. Part I. Neurobiological mechanisms underlying stunning and killing. Meat Sci. 2016; 118:133-46. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2016.03.011. View