» Articles » PMID: 38611293

The Influence of Chitosan on the Chemical Composition of Wines Fermented with

Overview
Journal Foods
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2024 Apr 13
PMID 38611293
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Chitosan exerts a significant influence on various chemical parameters affecting the quality of wine produced using multiple strains of . The impact of chitosan on these parameters varies depending on the specific strain studied. We observed that, under the influence of chitosan, the fermentation kinetics accelerated for all examined strains. The formation of lactic acid increased by 41% to 97% across the studied strains, depending on the specific strain. This effect also influenced acidity-related parameters such as total acidity, which increased by 28% to 60%, and pH, which experienced a decrease of over 0.5 units. The consumption of malic acid increased by 9% to 20% depending on the specific strain of . Nitrogen consumption also rose, as evidenced by all strains exhibiting a residual value of Primary Amino Nitrogen (PAN) of below the detection limit, and ammonia consumption increased by 90% to 100%, depending on the strain studied. However, certain parameters such as acetic acid, succinic acid, and glycerol showed contradictory results depending on the strain under investigation. In terms of volatile composition, chitosan supplementation led to increased production of i-butanol by 32% to 65%, 3-methylbutanol by 33% to 63%, and lactic acid ethyl ester by 58% to 91% across all studied strains of . Other analyzed aroma compounds exhibited varying changes depending on the specific strain of .

Citing Articles

Effects of Heterologous Expression of Genes Related L-Malic acid Metabolism in on Flavor Substances Production in Wine.

Li P, Song W, Wang Y, Li X, Wu S, Li B Foods. 2024; 13(13).

PMID: 38998544 PMC: 11241653. DOI: 10.3390/foods13132038.

References
1.
Colangelo D, Torchio F, De Faveri D, Lambri M . The use of chitosan as alternative to bentonite for wine fining: Effects on heat-stability, proteins, organic acids, colour, and volatile compounds in an aromatic white wine. Food Chem. 2018; 264:301-309. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.05.005. View

2.
Vicente J, Navascues E, Calderon F, Santos A, Marquina D, Benito S . An Integrative View of the Role of in Wine Technology. Foods. 2021; 10(11). PMC: 8625220. DOI: 10.3390/foods10112878. View

3.
Valera M, Sainz F, Mas A, Torija M . Effect of chitosan and SO on viability of Acetobacter strains in wine. Int J Food Microbiol. 2017; 246:1-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2017.01.022. View

4.
Vicente J, Vladic L, Navascues E, Brezina S, Santos A, Calderon F . A comparative study of fermentative performance under standardized wine production conditions. Food Chem X. 2024; 21:101214. PMC: 10876678. DOI: 10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101214. View

5.
Bagder Elmaci S, Gulgor G, Tokatli M, Erten H, Isci A, Ozcelik F . Effectiveness of chitosan against wine-related microorganisms. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2014; 107(3):675-86. DOI: 10.1007/s10482-014-0362-6. View