» Articles » PMID: 38602956

The Effect of Perceived Organizational and Supervisory Support on Employee Engagement During COVID-19 Crises: Mediating Effect of Work-Life Balance Policy

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2024 Apr 11
PMID 38602956
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This article examines how organizational and supervisory supports, directly and indirectly, impact employee engagement in U.S. federal agencies during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study applies two analysis models for two different sample groups: federal workers who were required to be physically present at a worksite during the pandemic and those who were not required to do so. Drawing from the sampling frame comprised of "permanently employed, non-political, non-seasonal, full- or part-time federal employees" in pay status as of October 2019, the findings from the U.S. Federal Employment Viewpoint Survey 2020 indicate that organizational and supervisory supports directly impact employee engagement regardless of employees' work arrangements. However, work engagement is not increased by organizational and supervisory supports that actively encourage employees to use conventional incentives such as work-life balance policies. At the organizational level, this study suggests the need to redesign strategies to motivate public agents to engage in the agency's mission because conventional and systemic employee support may be ineffective as currently designed. Overall, this study sheds more light on existing studies of public human resource management by examining employee engagement according to work arrangements during the pandemic.

Citing Articles

The role of supervisor support in the association between night work and depressive symptoms: a gender-stratified analysis of 22,422 full-time wage workers in Korea.

Kim H, Kim J, Lee G, Lee H, Lee H, Kim S Epidemiol Health. 2024; 46:e2024079.

PMID: 39363606 PMC: 11832242. DOI: 10.4178/epih.e2024079.

References
1.
Harter J, Schmidt F, Hayes T . Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol. 2002; 87(2):268-79. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268. View

2.
Schlomer G, Bauman S, Card N . Best practices for missing data management in counseling psychology. J Couns Psychol. 2010; 57(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1037/a0018082. View

3.
Bakker A, Demerouti E . Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. J Occup Health Psychol. 2016; 22(3):273-285. DOI: 10.1037/ocp0000056. View

4.
Caligiuri P, De Cieri H, Minbaeva D, Verbeke A, Zimmermann A . International HRM insights for navigating the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for future research and practice. J Int Bus Stud. 2020; 51(5):697-713. PMC: 7266413. DOI: 10.1057/s41267-020-00335-9. View

5.
Tensay A, Singh M . The nexus between HRM, employee engagement and organizational performance of federal public service organizations in Ethiopia. Heliyon. 2020; 6(6):e04094. PMC: 7303557. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04094. View