» Articles » PMID: 30135612

Comparing Work Engagement in People-Changing and People-Processing Service Providers: A Mediation Model With Red Tape, Autonomy, Dimensions of PSM, and Performance

Overview
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2018 Aug 24
PMID 30135612
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Due to the increasing demanding work environment, public managers need their employees to be proactive and dedicated and feel energetic in their work to reach high performance-that is, public organizations need engaged workers. However, there is a dearth of research examining work engagement in the public sector context in general and in different institutional contexts (e.g., education vis-à-vis central government) in particular. The goal of this study is to examine the relationship between antecedents and outcomes of work engagement in the public sector in general and the within-public sector differences including institutional contexts in particular. Based on the analysis of a large data set, it can be concluded that public servants have different personalities and work in different institutional contexts, and these differences influence their work engagement. The importance of work engagement research in public administration is further confirmed because it leads to higher performance and job satisfaction across sectors.

Citing Articles

The Effect of Perceived Organizational and Supervisory Support on Employee Engagement During COVID-19 Crises: Mediating Effect of Work-Life Balance Policy.

Lee S, Shin G Public Pers Manage. 2024; 52(3):401-428.

PMID: 38602956 PMC: 10183338. DOI: 10.1177/00910260231171395.


Perceived superior trust and organizational commitment among public employees: The mediating role of burnout and the moderating role of public service motivation.

Lin M, Liu Q, Li Z Heliyon. 2024; 10(3):e24997.

PMID: 38318016 PMC: 10839975. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24997.


Can public service motivation increase work engagement?-A meta-analysis across cultures.

Ding M, Wang C Front Psychol. 2023; 13:1060941.

PMID: 36710804 PMC: 9874331. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1060941.


Employability in the public sector: The impact of individual and organizational determinants.

Vermeeren B, Van der Heijden B Front Psychol. 2023; 13:1041618.

PMID: 36591038 PMC: 9800972. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041618.


Engagement, Exhaustion, and Perceived Performance of Public Employees Before and During the COVID-19 Crisis.

Giauque D, Renard K, Cornu F, Emery Y Public Pers Manage. 2022; 51(3):263-290.

PMID: 36093284 PMC: 9445401. DOI: 10.1177/00910260211073154.


References
1.
Ryan R, Deci E . On happiness and human potentials: a review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001; 52:141-66. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141. View

2.
George B, Pandey S . We Know the Yin-But Where Is the Yang? Toward a Balanced Approach on Common Source Bias in Public Administration Scholarship. Rev Public Pers Adm. 2017; 37(2):245-270. PMC: 5633037. DOI: 10.1177/0734371X17698189. View

3.
Tummers L, Steijn B, Nevicka B, Heerema M . The Effects of Leadership and Job Autonomy on Vitality: Survey and Experimental Evidence. Rev Public Pers Adm. 2018; 38(3):355-377. PMC: 6055114. DOI: 10.1177/0734371X16671980. View

4.
Crawford E, LePine J, Rich B . Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: a theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. J Appl Psychol. 2010; 95(5):834-48. DOI: 10.1037/a0019364. View

5.
Ryan R, Deci E . Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2001; 55(1):68-78. DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68. View