» Articles » PMID: 38601874

Safety and Efficacy of a Feed Additive Consisting of an Essential Oil Derived from Fresh Leaves of Maton & Sm. Ex R. Powell and (L.) L. (cajuput Oil) for Use in All Animal Species (FEFANA Asbl)

Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of cajuput oil obtained from fresh leaves of Maton & Sm. ex R. Powell and (L.) L., when used as a sensory additive for all animal species. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that cajuput oil is safe up to the maximum proposed use levels in complete feed of 30 mg/kg for sows and dogs, 50 mg/kg for horses and ornamental fish, 40 mg/kg for salmon and 5 mg/kg for cats. For the other species, the calculated safe concentrations were 18 mg/kg for chickens for fattening, 26 mg/kg for laying hens, 23 mg/kg for turkeys for fattening, 37 mg/kg for pigs for fattening, 31 mg/kg for piglets, 78 mg/kg for veal calves (milk replacer), 69 mg/kg for cattle for fattening and sheep/goats, 45 mg/kg for dairy cows and 28 mg/kg for rabbits. These conclusions were extrapolated to other physiologically related species. For any other species, the additive is safe at 5 mg/kg complete feed. The use of cajuput oil in water for drinking was considered safe provided that the total daily intake does not exceed the daily amount considered safe when consumed via feed. No concerns for consumers and the environment were identified following the use of the additive up to the highest safe use level in feed. The essential oil under assessment should be considered as an irritant to skin and eyes, and as a dermal and respiratory sensitiser. Since cajuput oil was recognised to flavour food and their function in feed would be essentially the same as that in food, no further demonstration of efficacy was considered necessary.

Citing Articles

Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an essential oil derived from fresh leaves of Maton & Sm. ex R. Powell and (L.) L. (cajuput oil) for use in all animal species (FEFANA asbl).

Bampidis V, Azimonti G, Bastos M, Christensen H, Durjava M, Kouba M EFSA J. 2024; 22(4):e8732.

PMID: 38601874 PMC: 11004901. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8732.

References
1.
More S, Bampidis V, Benford D, Bennekou S, Bragard C, Halldorsson T . Guidance on harmonised methodologies for human health, animal health and ecological risk assessment of combined exposure to multiple chemicals. EFSA J. 2020; 17(3):e05634. PMC: 7009070. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5634. View

2.
Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos M, Bories G . Guidance on the assessment of the efficacy of feed additives. EFSA J. 2020; 16(5):e05274. PMC: 7009555. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5274. View

3.
Farag R, Shalaby A, El-Baroty G, Ibrahim N, Ali M, Hassan E . Chemical and biological evaluation of the essential oils of different Melaleuca species. Phytother Res. 2004; 18(1):30-5. DOI: 10.1002/ptr.1348. View

4.
Rychen G, Aquilina G, Azimonti G, Bampidis V, Bastos M, Bories G . Guidance on the identity, characterisation and conditions of use of feed additives. EFSA J. 2020; 15(10):e05023. PMC: 7010039. DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2017.5023. View

5.
Andersen A . Final report on the safety assessment of benzaldehyde. Int J Toxicol. 2006; 25 Suppl 1:11-27. DOI: 10.1080/10915810600716612. View