» Articles » PMID: 38594841

Difficult-to-treat Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Effectiveness and Safety of 4th and 5th Lines of Treatment

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2024 Apr 10
PMID 38594841
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have signs or symptoms of active disease despite multiple treatment attempts. This emerging concept is defined as difficult-to-treat IBD.

Aim: The objective of this study was to investigate for the first time the treatment persistence, efficacy and safety of biologics or small molecules used in 4th or 5th line therapy.

Methods: We reviewed all consecutive patients with IBD treated at the Nancy University Hospital between July 2022 and April 2023 with the 4th or 5th line treatment for at least three months. The primary outcome was to assess the persistence rate of 4th and 5th line therapy.

Results: We enrolled 82 patients with IBD (4th line: 44; 5th line: 38). On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the duration of risankizumab, ustekinumab or vedolizumab therapy did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) as 4th and 5th line treatment. The restricted mean survival time analysis showed that the persistence rate of risankizumab was the highest as 4th line therapy (risankizumab vs. vedolizumab: 36.0 and 29.4 weeks, respectively, p = 0.008; risankizumab vs. ustekinumab: 36.0 and 32.8 weeks, respectively, p = 0.035). In multivariate regression, Crohn's disease diagnosis (Odd ratio 4.6; 95% confidence interval 1.7-12.4) was significantly associated with treatment persistence.

Conclusion: In this first real-world setting, risankizumab could have a longer persistence rate as 4th line treatment for IBD than other agents. Persistence of biological agents was greater in Crohn's disease than in ulcerative colitis. More studies are needed to compare treatment efficacy in patients with difficult-to-treat IBD.

Citing Articles

Immunity in digestive diseases: new drugs for inflammatory bowel disease treatment-insights from Phase II and III trials.

Massironi S, Furfaro F, Bencardino S, Allocca M, Danese S J Gastroenterol. 2024; 59(9):761-787.

PMID: 38980426 PMC: 11339122. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-024-02130-x.


Difficult-to-treat inflammatory bowel disease: Effectiveness and safety of 4th and 5th lines of treatment.

Caron B, Habert A, Bonsack O, Camara H, Jeanbert E, Parigi T United European Gastroenterol J. 2024; 12(5):605-613.

PMID: 38594841 PMC: 11176900. DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12547.

References
1.
Nagy G, Roodenrijs N, Welsing P, Kedves M, Hamar A, van der Goes M . EULAR definition of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2020; 80(1):31-35. PMC: 7788062. DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217344. View

2.
Parigi T, DAmico F, Abreu M, Dignass A, Dotan I, Magro F . Difficult-to-treat inflammatory bowel disease: results from an international consensus meeting. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2023; 8(9):853-859. DOI: 10.1016/S2468-1253(23)00154-1. View

3.
Allez M, Vermeire S, Mozziconacci N, Michetti P, Laharie D, Louis E . The efficacy and safety of a third anti-TNF monoclonal antibody in Crohn's disease after failure of two other anti-TNF antibodies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009; 31(1):92-101. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04130.x. View

4.
Albshesh A, Taylor J, Savarino E, Truyens M, Armuzzi A, Ribaldone D . Effectiveness of Third-Class Biologic Treatment in Crohn's Disease: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study. J Clin Med. 2021; 10(13). PMC: 8268494. DOI: 10.3390/jcm10132914. View

5.
Singh S, George J, Boland B, Vande Casteele N, Sandborn W . Primary Non-Response to Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonists is Associated with Inferior Response to Second-line Biologics in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Crohns Colitis. 2018; 12(6):635-643. PMC: 7189966. DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjy004. View