» Articles » PMID: 38592410

Outcomes of Severe ARDS COVID-19 Patients Denied for Venovenous ECMO Support: A Prospective Observational Comparative Study

Overview
Journal J Clin Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2024 Apr 9
PMID 38592410
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

: Few data are available concerning the outcome of patients denied venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) relative to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19. : We compared the 90-day survival rate of consecutive adult patients for whom our center was contacted to discuss VV-ECMO indication. Three groups of patients were created: patients for whom VV-ECMO was immediately indicated (ECMO-indicated group), patients for whom VV-ECMO was not indicated at the time of the call (ECMO-not-indicated group), and patients for whom ECMO was definitely contraindicated (ECMO-contraindicated group). : In total, 104 patients were referred for VV-ECMO support due to severe COVID-19 ARDS. Among them, 32 patients had immediate VV-ECMO implantation, 28 patients had no VV-ECMO indication, but 1 was assisted thereafter, and 44 patients were denied VV-ECMO for contraindication. Among the 44 patients denied, 30 were denied for advanced age, 24 for excessive prior duration of mechanical ventilation, and 16 for SOFA score >8. The 90-day survival rate was similar for the ECMO-indicated group and the ECMO-not-indicated group at 62.1 and 61.9%, respectively, whereas it was significantly lower (20.5%) for the ECMO-contraindicated group. : Despite a low survival rate, 50% of patients were at home 3 months after being denied for VV-ECMO for severe ARDS due to COVID-19.

References
1.
Schmidt M, Zogheib E, Roze H, Repesse X, Lebreton G, Luyt C . The PRESERVE mortality risk score and analysis of long-term outcomes after extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2013; 39(10):1704-13. PMC: 7094902. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-013-3037-2. View

2.
Schmidt M, Hajage D, Lebreton G, Dres M, Guervilly C, Richard J . Prone Positioning During Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients With Severe ARDS: The PRONECMO Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023; 330(24):2343-2353. PMC: 10692949. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.24491. View

3.
Karagiannidis C, Strassmann S, Merten M, Bein T, Windisch W, Meybohm P . High In-Hospital Mortality Rate in Patients with COVID-19 Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Germany: A Critical Analysis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021; 204(8):991-994. PMC: 8534613. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202105-1145LE. View

4.
Bartlett R, Ogino M, Brodie D, McMullan D, Lorusso R, MacLaren G . Initial ELSO Guidance Document: ECMO for COVID-19 Patients with Severe Cardiopulmonary Failure. ASAIO J. 2020; 66(5):472-474. PMC: 7273858. DOI: 10.1097/MAT.0000000000001173. View

5.
Levy D, Lebreton G, De Chambrun M, Hekimian G, Chommeloux J, Brechot N . Outcomes of Patients Denied Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Greater Paris, France. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021; 204(8):994-997. PMC: 8534624. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202105-1312LE. View