» Articles » PMID: 38584988

Physiological Condition Infers Habitat Choice in Juvenile Sockeye Salmon

Overview
Journal Conserv Physiol
Date 2024 Apr 8
PMID 38584988
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The amount of time that juvenile salmon remain in an estuary varies among and within populations, with some individuals passing through their estuary in hours while others remain in the estuary for several months. Underlying differences in individual physiological condition, such as body size, stored energy and osmoregulatory function, could drive individual variation in the selection of estuary habitat. Here we investigated the role of variation in physiological condition on the selection of estuarine and ocean habitat by sockeye salmon () smolts intercepted at the initiation of their 650-km downstream migration from Chilko Lake, Fraser River, British Columbia (BC). Behavioural salinity preference experiments were conducted on unfed smolts held in fresh water at three time intervals during their downstream migration period, representing the stage of migration at lake-exit, and the expected timing for estuary-entry and ocean-entry (0, 1 and 3 weeks after lake-exit, respectively). In general, salinity preference behaviour varied across the three time periods consistent with expected transition from river to estuary to ocean. Further, individual physiological condition did influence habitat choice. Smolt condition factor (K) and energy density were positively correlated with salinity preference behaviour in the estuary and ocean outmigration stages, but not at lake-exit. Our results suggest that smolt physiological condition upon reaching the estuary could influence migratory behaviour and habitat selection. This provides evidence on the temporally dependent interplay of physiology, behaviour and migration in wild juvenile Pacific salmon, with juvenile rearing conditions influencing smolt energetic status, which in turn influences habitat choice during downstream migration. The implication for the conservation of migratory species is that the relative importance of stopover habitats may vary as a function of initial condition.

References
1.
Neiffer D, Stamper M . Fish sedation, analgesia, anesthesia, and euthanasia: considerations, methods, and types of drugs. ILAR J. 2009; 50(4):343-60. DOI: 10.1093/ilar.50.4.343. View

2.
Hardesty-Moore M, Deinet S, Freeman R, Titcomb G, Dillon E, Stears K . Migration in the Anthropocene: how collective navigation, environmental system and taxonomy shape the vulnerability of migratory species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018; 373(1746). PMC: 5882986. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0017. View

3.
Jones K, Cornwell T, Bottom D, Campbell L, Stein S . The contribution of estuary-resident life histories to the return of adult Oncorhynchus kisutch. J Fish Biol. 2014; 85(1):52-80. DOI: 10.1111/jfb.12380. View

4.
Wagner G, Kuchel L, Lotto A, Patterson D, Shrimpton J, Hinch S . Routine and active metabolic rates of migrating adult wild sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka Walbaum) in seawater and freshwater. Physiol Biochem Zool. 2005; 79(1):100-8. DOI: 10.1086/498186. View

5.
Nielsen C, Aarestrup K, Norum U, Madsen S . Future migratory behaviour predicted from premigratory levels of gill Na+/K+-ATPase activity in individual wild brown trout (Salmo trutta). J Exp Biol. 2003; 207(Pt 3):527-33. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.00783. View