» Articles » PMID: 19949251

Fish Sedation, Analgesia, Anesthesia, and Euthanasia: Considerations, Methods, and Types of Drugs

Overview
Journal ILAR J
Date 2009 Dec 2
PMID 19949251
Citations 81
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Fish display robust neuroendocrine and physiologic stress responses to noxious stimuli. Many anesthetic, sedative, or analgesic drugs used in other vertebrates reduce stress in fish, decrease handling trauma, minimize movement and physiologic changes in response to nociceptive stimuli, and can be used for euthanasia. But extrapolating from limited published anesthetic and sedative data to all fish species is potentially harmful because of marked anatomic, physiologic, and behavioral variations; instead, a stepwise approach to anesthetizing or sedating unfamiliar species or using unproven drugs for familiar species is advisable. Additionally, knowledge of how water quality influences anesthesia or sedation helps limit complications. The most common method of drug administration is through immersion, a technique analogous to gaseous inhalant anesthesia in terrestrial animals, but the use of injectable anesthetic and sedative agents (primarily intramuscularly, but also intravenously) is increasing. Regardless of the route of administration, routine preprocedural preparation is appropriate, to stage both the animals and the supplies for induction, maintenance, and recovery. Anesthetic and sedation monitoring and resuscitation are similar to those for other vertebrates. Euthanasia is most commonly performed using an overdose of an immersion drug but injectable agents are also effective. Analgesia is an area in need of significant research as only a few studies exist and they provide some contrasting results. However, fish have mu and kappa opiate receptors throughout the brain, making it reasonable to expect some effect of at least opioid treatments in fish experiencing noxious stimuli.

Citing Articles

Ameliorative potential of Populus alba leaf powder against hexaflumuron exposure in Nile tilapia: immune-antioxidant, biochemical, histological, and transcriptomic analysis.

Ibrahim R, Farag M, Sobh M, Abdelwarith A, Younis E, Bazeed S Fish Physiol Biochem. 2025; 51(2):67.

PMID: 40085298 DOI: 10.1007/s10695-025-01465-3.


Nano-chitosan hydrogel alleviates Candida albicans-induced health alterations in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus): antioxidant response, neuro-behaviors, hepato-renal functions, and histopathological investigation.

Mahboub H, Rahman A, Elazab S, Abdelwarith A, Younis E, Shaalan M BMC Vet Res. 2025; 21(1):159.

PMID: 40057767 PMC: 11889809. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-025-04568-4.


Transcriptomic and biometric parameters analysis in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) challenged with viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV).

Ghaderzadeh M, Rahimi-Mianji G, Nejati-Javaremi A, Shahbazian N BMC Genomics. 2025; 26(1):204.

PMID: 40021981 PMC: 11869454. DOI: 10.1186/s12864-025-11300-x.


Alleviative potential of dietary essential oils against nickel toxicity triggers neurobehavioral abnormalities, biochemical dysfunction, and histopathological alterations in Nile tilapia.

Ahmed S, Ahmed A, Elshopakey G, Younis E, Abdelwarith A, Saad M Vet Res Commun. 2025; 49(2):107.

PMID: 39964622 DOI: 10.1007/s11259-025-10661-8.


Ameliorative role of camel protein hydrolysates diet against alkaline stress in Oreochrmis niloticus: Hematology, immune responses and their regulating genes expression, and histopathological assays.

Alsubaie N, Ibrahim R, Bawahab A, Mohamed A, Abd-Elhakim Y, Khamis T Vet Res Commun. 2025; 49(2):79.

PMID: 39821552 DOI: 10.1007/s11259-024-10637-0.