» Articles » PMID: 38578480

A Qualitative Analysis of Patient and Caregiver Experiences with Myelomeningocele Through Online Discussion Boards

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2024 Apr 5
PMID 38578480
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Patients and caregivers impacted by myelomeningocele (MMC) use online discussion board forums to create community and share information and concerns about this complex medical condition. We aim to identify the primary concerns expressed on these forums with the goal of understanding gaps in care that may merit investment of resources to improve care received by this population.

Methods: Anonymous posts from online MMC discussion boards were compiled using internet search engines. Posts were then analyzed using an adaptation of the Grounded Theory Method, a three-step system involving open, axial, and selective coding of the data by two independent researchers to identify common themes.

Results: Analysis of 400 posts written primarily by parents (n = 342, 85.5%) and patients (n = 45, 11.25%) yielded three overarching themes: questions surrounding quality of life, a lack of support for mothers of children with MMC, and confusion with a complex healthcare system. Many posts revealed concerns about management and well-being with MMC, including posts discussing symptoms and related conditions (n = 299, 75.75%), treatments (n = 259, 65.75%), and emotional aspects of MMC (n = 146, 36.5%). Additionally, families, especially mothers, felt a lack of support in their roles as caregivers. Finally, in 118 posts (29.5%), patients and families expressed frustration with navigating a complex healthcare system and finding specialists whose opinions they trusted.

Conclusions: MMC is a complex medical condition that impacts patients and families in unique ways. Analysis of online discussion board posts identified key themes to be addressed in order to improve the healthcare experiences of those impacted by MMC.

References
1.
Mohd-Zin S, Marwan A, Abou Chaar M, Ahmad-Annuar A, Abdul-Aziz N . Spina Bifida: Pathogenesis, Mechanisms, and Genes in Mice and Humans. Scientifica (Cairo). 2017; 2017:5364827. PMC: 5327787. DOI: 10.1155/2017/5364827. View

2.
Copp A, Scott Adzick N, Chitty L, Fletcher J, Holmbeck G, Shaw G . Spina bifida. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016; 1:15007. PMC: 4898641. DOI: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.7. View

3.
Koch V, Lopes M, Furusawa E, Vaz K, Barroso U . Multidisciplinary management of people with spina bifida across the lifespan. Pediatr Nephrol. 2023; 39(3):681-697. DOI: 10.1007/s00467-023-06067-w. View

4.
Eriksson M, Bartonek A . Orthosis use and ambulation in adults with myelomeningocele after orthotic management from childhood. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023; 48(2):196-203. PMC: 11005670. DOI: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000279. View

5.
Gilbertson K, Liu T, Wiener J, Walker Jr W, Smith K, Castillo J . Age-Specific Probability of 4 Major Health Outcomes in Children with Spina Bifida. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2023; 44(9):e633-e641. PMC: 10926062. DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000001218. View