Orthosis Use and Ambulation in Adults with Myelomeningocele After Orthotic Management from Childhood

Overview

Journal Prosthet Orthot Int

Publisher Wolters Kluwer

Date 2023 Sep 19

PMID 37725508

Authors

Marie Eriksson

Asa Bartonek

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Orthotic devices are required for walking in many individuals with myelomeningocele. Evidence concerning orthosis use is sparse, partly because of heterogeneity among groups and different definitions of the neurological level.

Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate ambulation regarding orthosis use and satisfaction with orthoses after intense orthotic management during childhood.

Study Design: The study design is a retrospective follow-up with a cross-sectional study at adult age.

Methods: Participants comprised 59 persons born in 1985 or later. Ambulation was categorized as community (Ca), household (Ha), nonfunctional (N-f), and nonambulation (N-a) groups. Orthosis use was registered at approximately 5 (Age5) and 12 (Age12) years of age and in adulthood (AdultAge). Satisfaction with orthoses was evaluated at AdultAge.

Results: At Age5, Age12, and AdultAge, orthoses were used by 100%, 98%, and 78% of participants, respectively. Ambulation deteriorated between Age5 and Age12 in 17% of participants and between Age12 and AdultAge in 46%. At AdultAge, 63% maintained their ambulatory function; and muscle function and hip and knee flexion contractures were strongly correlated with ambulation. The ambulation groups did not differ regarding satisfaction with device or services, except in 2 single items where the Ha group differed in ratings from the N-f and N-a groups.

Conclusion: The high frequency of orthosis use and similar satisfaction in all ambulation groups emphasize that early planning and follow-up of orthosis treatment during growth are important for mobility in adulthood. Our results also underline the importance of a close assessment of each individual's condition.

Citing Articles

Maintained gait in persons with arthrogryposis from childhood to adulthood.

Bartonek A, Reimeringer M, Eriksson M BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025; 26(1):141.

PMID: 39939981 PMC: 11817894. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-025-08366-9.

Sensory and Motor Function, Pain, and Health Status in Children with Arthrogryposis and Myelomeningocele.

Bartonek A, Eriksson M Children (Basel). 2025; 11(12.

PMID: 39767908 PMC: 11674846. DOI: 10.3390/children11121480.

A qualitative analysis of patient and caregiver experiences with myelomeningocele through online discussion boards.

Koneru S, Bhavsar S, Pugazenthi S, Koller G, Karuparti S, Kann M Childs Nerv Syst. 2024; 40(6):1783-1790.

PMID: 38578480 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-024-06331-w.

References

Price D, McGrath P, Rafii A, Buckingham B . The validation of visual analogue scales as ratio scale measures for chronic and experimental pain. Pain. 1983; 17(1):45-56. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90126-4. View

Bartonek A, Saraste H, Eriksson M, Knutson L, Cresswell A . Upper body movement during walking in children with lumbo-sacral myelomeningocele. Gait Posture. 2002; 15(2):120-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(01)00147-3. View

Ivanyi B, Schoenmakers M, van Veen N, Maathuis K, Nollet F, Nederhand M . The effects of orthoses, footwear, and walking aids on the walking ability of children and adolescents with spina bifida: A systematic review using International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for Children and Youth (ICF-CY) as.... Prosthet Orthot Int. 2014; 39(6):437-43. DOI: 10.1177/0309364614543550. View

Schmid T, Strehl E, Trollmann R, Forst R, Fujak A . Orthotic Care Based on the Ferrari Concept for Children and Adults with Meningomyelocele. Z Orthop Unfall. 2019; 157(6):695-705. DOI: 10.1055/a-0853-8009. View

SHARRARD W . THE SEGMENTAL INNERVATION OF THE LOWER LIMB MUSCLES IN MAN. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1964; 35:106-22. PMC: 2311748. View

Copp A, Scott Adzick N, Chitty L, Fletcher J, Holmbeck G, Shaw G . Spina bifida. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016; 1:15007. PMC: 4898641. DOI: 10.1038/nrdp.2015.7. View

Wolf S, Alimusaj M, Rettig O, Doderlein L . Dynamic assist by carbon fiber spring AFOs for patients with myelomeningocele. Gait Posture. 2008; 28(1):175-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.11.012. View

Bartonek A, Gutierrez E, Haglund-Akerlind Y, Saraste H . The influence of spasticity in the lower limb muscles on gait pattern in children with sacral to mid-lumbar myelomeningocele: a gait analysis study. Gait Posture. 2005; 22(1):10-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2004.06.003. View

Bartonek A . Motor development toward ambulation in preschool children with myelomeningocele--a prospective study. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2010; 22(1):52-60. DOI: 10.1097/PEP.0b013e3181cc132b. View

10.

Gutierrez E, Bartonek A, Haglund-Akerlind Y, Saraste H . Characteristic gait kinematics in persons with lumbosacral myelomeningocele. Gait Posture. 2003; 18(3):170-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(03)00011-0. View

11.

Jarl G, Heinemann A, Hermansson L . Validity evidence for a modified version of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2012; 7(6):469-78. DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2012.667196. View

12.

FULFORD G, Cairns T . The problems associated with flail feet in children and their treatment with orthoses. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1978; 60(1):93-5. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.60B1.627586. View

13.

Bartonek A, Saraste H, Knutson L . Comparison of different systems to classify the neurological level of lesion in patients with myelomeningocele. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2000; 41(12):796-805. DOI: 10.1017/s0012162299001607. View

14.

Olsson I, Dahl M, Mattsson S, Wendelius M, Astrom E, Westbom L . Medical problems in adolescents with myelomeningocele (MMC): an inventory of the Swedish MMC population born during 1986-1989. Acta Paediatr. 2007; 96(3):446-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.00153.x. View

15.

Bartonek A, Eriksson M, Gutierrez-Farewik E . Effects of carbon fibre spring orthoses on gait in ambulatory children with motor disorders and plantarflexor weakness. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007; 49(8):615-20. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00615.x. View

16.

Hoffer M, Feiwell E, Perry R, Perry J, Bonnett C . Functional ambulation in patients with myelomeningocele. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973; 55(1):137-48. View

17.

Davis W, Zigler C, Crytzer T, Izzo S, Houtrow A, Dicianno B . Factors Associated With Ambulation in Myelomeningocele: A Longitudinal Study From the National Spina Bifida Patient Registry. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020; 99(7):586-594. PMC: 8968579. DOI: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001406. View

18.

Bartonek A, Saraste H . Factors influencing ambulation in myelomeningocele: a cross-sectional study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001; 43(4):253-60. DOI: 10.1017/s0012162201000482. View

19.

Bendt M, Gabrielsson H, Riedel D, Hagman G, Hultling C, Franzen E . Adults with spina bifida: A cross-sectional study of health issues and living conditions. Brain Behav. 2020; 10(8):e01736. PMC: 7428499. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.1736. View