Dermoscopy and Reflectance Confocal Microscopy of Solitary Flat Pink Lesions: A New Combined Score to Diagnose Amelanotic Melanoma

Overview

Journal J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol

Specialty Infectious Diseases

Date 2024 Apr 4

PMID 38572809

Authors

M Spadafora

A Megna

N Lippolis

M Cavicchi

S Borsari

S Piana

S Guida

S Kaleci

J Chester

G Pellacani

C Longo

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Differential diagnosis of amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma among solitary flat pink lesions is challenging, due to limited clinical and dermoscopic clues. Dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy assessments improve diagnostic accuracy, but their combined capacity among solitary flat pink lesions is yet to be defined.

Objectives: To determine (i) whether diagnostic accuracy is improved with combined dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy, (ii) a model to estimate probability of flat amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma among solitary flat pink lesions.

Methods: A retrospective single-centre study of solitary flat pink lesions, excised for suspected malignancy between 2011 and 2022 was performed. Images were independently evaluated by two dermatologists, blinded to histopathological diagnosis. Diagnostic performance was evaluated on the receiver operating characteristic curve and the area under the curve. Predictive features were identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. A final predictive nomogram of independent risk factors was calculated by backward likelihood ratio. Hypothesis being tested was formulated before data collection.

Results: A total of 184 patients (87 females, 47.3%) were included; mean age was 57.6 years (19-95). Combined dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy was more sensitive (83%, CI 69.2-92.4 and 91.5%, CI 79.6-97.6) than dermoscopy alone (76.6%, CI 62.0-87.7 and 85.1%, CI 71.7-93.8). Predictive features defined the new model, including linear irregular vessels (4.26-folds, CI 1.5-12.1), peripheral pigment network (6.07-folds, CI 1.83-20.15), remnants of pigmentation (4.3-folds, CI 1.27-14.55) at dermoscopy and atypical honeycomb (9.98-folds, CI 1.91-51.96), disarranged epidermal pattern (15.22-folds, CI 2.18-106.23), dendritic pagetoid cells in the epidermis (3.77-folds, CI 1.25-11.26), hypopigmented pagetoid cells (27.05-folds, CI 1.57-465.5), and dense and sparse nests (3.68-folds, CI 1.24-10.96) in reflectance confocal microscopy. Diagnostic accuracy of the model was high (AUC 0.91).

Conclusions: Adjunctive reflectance confocal microscopy increases diagnostic sensitivity of flat amelanotic/hypomelanotic melanoma differential diagnosis. The proposed model requires validation.

Citing Articles

Comparing in vivo and ex vivo features of amelanotic melanoma using reflectance confocal microscopy and line-field confocal optical coherence tomography.

J Tan I, Musolff N, Tchack M, Sanabria B, Truong T, Caetano V JAAD Case Rep. 2025; 57:64-66.

PMID: 40027431 PMC: 11869980. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdcr.2024.11.022.

Dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy, a synergistic approach: The (very) difficult differential diagnosis of flat solitary unpigmented lesions demonstration.

Thomas L, Pham F J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024; 39(1):21-22.

PMID: 39711426 PMC: 11664443. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.20422.

Reflectance Confocal Microscopy and Dermoscopy for the Diagnosis of Solitary Hypopigmented Pink Lesions: A Narrative Review.

Ambrosio L, Pogorzelska-Antkowiak A, Retrosi C, Di Lella G, Spadafora M, Zalaudek I Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(17).

PMID: 39272830 PMC: 11394582. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16172972.

Thin Amelanotic and Hypomelanotic Melanoma: Clinicopathological and Dermoscopic Features.

Paolino G, Pampena R, Di Ciaccio S, Carugno A, Cantisani C, Di Nicola M Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(8).

PMID: 39202520 PMC: 11356094. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60081239.

Dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy of solitary flat pink lesions: A new combined score to diagnose amelanotic melanoma.

Spadafora M, Megna A, Lippolis N, Cavicchi M, Borsari S, Piana S J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2024; 39(1):109-116.

PMID: 38572809 PMC: 11664461. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.19991.

References

Guitera P, Menzies S, Argenziano G, Longo C, Losi A, Drummond M . Dermoscopy and in vivo confocal microscopy are complementary techniques for diagnosis of difficult amelanotic and light-coloured skin lesions. Br J Dermatol. 2016; 175(6):1311-1319. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14749. View

Ferrari F, Bassoli S, Pellacani G, Argenziano G, Cesinaro A, Longo C . Similar but Different: How Reflectance Confocal Microscopy May Help in the Diagnosis of Pink Lesions. Dermatology. 2017; 233(2-3):212-216. DOI: 10.1159/000477539. View

Losi A, Longo C, Cesinaro A, Benati E, Witkowski A, Guitera P . Hyporeflective pagetoid cells: a new clue for amelanotic melanoma diagnosis by reflectance confocal microscopy. Br J Dermatol. 2013; 171(1):48-54. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.12781. View

Menzies S, Kreusch J, Byth K, Pizzichetta M, Marghoob A, Braun R . Dermoscopic evaluation of amelanotic and hypomelanotic melanoma. Arch Dermatol. 2008; 144(9):1120-7. DOI: 10.1001/archderm.144.9.1120. View

Alvarez-Salafranca M, Ara M, Zaballos P . Dermoscopy in Basal Cell Carcinoma: An Updated Review. Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed). 2020; 112(4):330-338. DOI: 10.1016/j.ad.2020.11.011. View

Bono A, Maurichi A, Moglia D, Camerini T, Tragni G, Lualdi M . Clinical and dermatoscopic diagnosis of early amelanotic melanoma. Melanoma Res. 2001; 11(5):491-4. DOI: 10.1097/00008390-200110000-00008. View

Longo C, Guida S, Mirra M, Pampena R, Ciardo S, Bassoli S . Dermatoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy for basal cell carcinoma diagnosis and diagnosis prediction score: A prospective and multicenter study on 1005 lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024; 90(5):994-1001. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.01.035. View

Cheung W, Patel R, Leonard A, Firoz B, Meehan S . Amelanotic melanoma: a detailed morphologic analysis with clinicopathologic correlation of 75 cases. J Cutan Pathol. 2011; 39(1):33-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.2011.01808.x. View

Papageorgiou V, Apalla Z, Sotiriou E, Papageorgiou C, Lazaridou E, Vakirlis S . The limitations of dermoscopy: false-positive and false-negative tumours. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018; 32(6):879-888. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.14782. View

10.

Zalaudek I, Giacomel J, Argenziano G, Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Micantonio T, Di Stefani A . Dermoscopy of facial nonpigmented actinic keratosis. Br J Dermatol. 2006; 155(5):951-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07426.x. View

11.

Braga J, Scope A, Klaz I, Mecca P, Gonzalez S, Rabinovitz H . The significance of reflectance confocal microscopy in the assessment of solitary pink skin lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009; 61(2):230-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.02.036. View

12.

Braun R, Rabinovitz H, Oliviero M, Kopf A, Saurat J . Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2005; 52(1):109-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2001.11.001. View

13.

Cinotti E, Labeille B, Debarbieux S, Carrera C, Lacarrubba F, Witkowski A . Dermoscopy vs. reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of lentigo maligna. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018; 32(8):1284-1291. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.14791. View

14.

Gill M, Gonzalez S . Enlightening the Pink: Use of Confocal Microscopy in Pink Lesions. Dermatol Clin. 2016; 34(4):443-458. DOI: 10.1016/j.det.2016.05.007. View

15.

Russo T, Pampena R, Piccolo V, Alfano R, Papageorgiou C, Apalla Z . The prevalent dermoscopic criterion to distinguish between benign and suspicious pink tumours. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019; 33(10):1886-1891. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.15707. View

16.

Guitera P, Menzies S, Longo C, Cesinaro A, Scolyer R, Pellacani G . In vivo confocal microscopy for diagnosis of melanoma and basal cell carcinoma using a two-step method: analysis of 710 consecutive clinically equivocal cases. J Invest Dermatol. 2012; 132(10):2386-2394. DOI: 10.1038/jid.2012.172. View

17.

Witkowski A, Ludzik J, DeCarvalho N, Ciardo S, Longo C, DiNardo A . Non-invasive diagnosis of pink basal cell carcinoma: how much can we rely on dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy?. Skin Res Technol. 2015; 22(2):230-7. DOI: 10.1111/srt.12254. View

18.

Navarrete-Dechent C, Liopyris K, Monnier J, Aleissa S, Boyce L, Longo C . Reflectance confocal microscopy terminology glossary for melanocytic skin lesions: A systematic review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020; 84(1):102-119. PMC: 8387955. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.05.097. View

19.

Minagawa A . Dermoscopy-pathology relationship in seborrheic keratosis. J Dermatol. 2017; 44(5):518-524. DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.13657. View

20.

Haspeslagh M, Noe M, De Wispelaere I, Degryse N, Vossaert K, Lanssens S . Rosettes and other white shiny structures in polarized dermoscopy: histological correlate and optical explanation. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015; 30(2):311-3. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.13080. View