» Articles » PMID: 38572364

Analysing Food Groups and Nutrient Intake in Adults Who Met and Did Not Meet the Daily Recommended Vegetable Intake of 350 G: the 2016 National Health and Nutrition Survey in Japan

Overview
Journal J Nutr Sci
Date 2024 Apr 4
PMID 38572364
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to compare the differences in the intake of food groups and nutrients between Japanese adults who consumed the recommended daily vegetable intake (350 g/day) and those who did not. Dietary information was obtained from one-day dietary records collected from the 2016 National Health and Nutrition Survey, which was conducted in 46 prefectures in Japan. The participants aged ≥20 years ( = 21,606; 53.8% women) were classified into the < and ≥350 g/day groups. Inter-group differences for 17 food groups and 27 nutrients were assessed as percentages of consumers (food groups only) and energy-adjusted intake (units/MJ/d or % of total energy intake). Overall, 29% of participants consumed ≥350 g/day of vegetables. The ≥350 g/day group had a higher percentage of consumers and energy-adjusted intakes for all vegetable subgroups than the <350 g/day group. For other food groups, the ≥350 g/day group had higher percentages of consumers for all food groups, except for cereals, eggs, and condiments and seasonings, which showed no significant differences. However, the ≥350 g/day group had a significantly higher energy-adjusted intake for potatoes and other tubers, mushrooms, meats, and condiments and seasonings but a significantly lower value for cereals, eggs, savoury snacks and confectionaries, and beverages. The ≥350 g/day group had a significantly higher intake of almost all (25/27) nutrients, including sodium, than the <350 g/day group. Participants with vegetable intake ≥350 g/day might have a more favourable intake of food groups and nutrients; however, watching for salt intake is necessary when promoting vegetable intake.

References
1.
Micha R, Penalvo J, Cudhea F, Imamura F, Rehm C, Mozaffarian D . Association Between Dietary Factors and Mortality From Heart Disease, Stroke, and Type 2 Diabetes in the United States. JAMA. 2017; 317(9):912-924. PMC: 5852674. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.0947. View

2.
Tooze J, Midthune D, Dodd K, Freedman L, Krebs-Smith S, Subar A . A new statistical method for estimating the usual intake of episodically consumed foods with application to their distribution. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006; 106(10):1575-87. PMC: 2517157. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.07.003. View

3.
Murphy S, Guenther P, Kretsch M . Using the dietary reference intakes to assess intakes of groups: pitfalls to avoid. J Am Diet Assoc. 2006; 106(10):1550-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.jada.2006.08.021. View

4.
Iwaoka F, Yoshiike N, Date C, Shimada T, Tanaka H . A validation study on a method to estimate nutrient intake by family members through a household-based food-weighing survey. J Nutr Sci Vitaminol (Tokyo). 2001; 47(3):222-7. DOI: 10.3177/jnsv.47.222. View

5.
Aune D, Giovannucci E, Boffetta P, Fadnes L, Keum N, Norat T . Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality-a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. Int J Epidemiol. 2017; 46(3):1029-1056. PMC: 5837313. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyw319. View