» Articles » PMID: 38571954

Identifying Antinuclear Antibody Positive Individuals at Risk for Developing Systemic Autoimmune Disease: Development and Validation of a Real-time Risk Model

Abstract

Objective: Positive antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) cause diagnostic dilemmas for clinicians. Currently, no tools exist to help clinicians interpret the significance of a positive ANA in individuals without diagnosed autoimmune diseases. We developed and validated a risk model to predict risk of developing autoimmune disease in positive ANA individuals.

Methods: Using a de-identified electronic health record (EHR), we randomly chart reviewed 2,000 positive ANA individuals to determine if a systemic autoimmune disease was diagnosed by a rheumatologist. , we considered demographics, billing codes for autoimmune disease-related symptoms, and laboratory values as variables for the risk model. We performed logistic regression and machine learning models using training and validation samples.

Results: We assembled training (n = 1030) and validation (n = 449) sets. Positive ANA individuals who were younger, female, had a higher titer ANA, higher platelet count, disease-specific autoantibodies, and more billing codes related to symptoms of autoimmune diseases were all more likely to develop autoimmune diseases. The most important variables included having a disease-specific autoantibody, number of billing codes for autoimmune disease-related symptoms, and platelet count. In the logistic regression model, AUC was 0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.86) in the training set and 0.75 (95% CI 0.68-0.81) in the validation set.

Conclusion: We developed and validated a risk model that predicts risk for developing systemic autoimmune diseases and can be deployed easily within the EHR. The model can risk stratify positive ANA individuals to ensure high-risk individuals receive urgent rheumatology referrals while reassuring low-risk individuals and reducing unnecessary referrals.

Citing Articles

Emerging Mechanisms and Biomarkers Associated with T-Cells and B-Cells in Autoimmune Disorders.

Sivalingam A Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2025; 68(1):14.

PMID: 39932617 DOI: 10.1007/s12016-025-09022-9.


Utility of common investigations for suspected inflammatory arthritis in adults.

Cook N, Buchbinder R Aust Prescr. 2024; 47(4):119-124.

PMID: 39228464 PMC: 11368532. DOI: 10.18773/austprescr.2024.035.

References
1.
Ertenli I, Kiraz S, Ozturk M, Haznedaroglu I, Celik I, Calguneri M . Pathologic thrombopoiesis of rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2003; 23(2):49-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00296-003-0289-0. View

2.
Patel V, Stewart D, Horstman M . E-consults: an effective way to decrease clinic wait times in rheumatology. BMC Rheumatol. 2020; 4:54. PMC: 7556892. DOI: 10.1186/s41927-020-00152-5. View

3.
McGhee J, Kickingbird L, Jarvis J . Clinical utility of antinuclear antibody tests in children. BMC Pediatr. 2004; 4:13. PMC: 476739. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-4-13. View

4.
Kirino Y, Remmers E . Genetic architectures of seropositive and seronegative rheumatic diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015; 11(7):401-14. DOI: 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.41. View

5.
Fernandez-Delgado M, Sirsat M, Cernadas E, Alawadi S, Barro S, Febrero-Bande M . An extensive experimental survey of regression methods. Neural Netw. 2019; 111:11-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.neunet.2018.12.010. View