» Articles » PMID: 38565617

Opportunities and Challenges in Design and Optimization of Protein Function

Overview
Date 2024 Apr 2
PMID 38565617
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The field of protein design has made remarkable progress over the past decade. Historically, the low reliability of purely structure-based design methods limited their application, but recent strategies that combine structure-based and sequence-based calculations, as well as machine learning tools, have dramatically improved protein engineering and design. In this Review, we discuss how these methods have enabled the design of increasingly complex structures and therapeutically relevant activities. Additionally, protein optimization methods have improved the stability and activity of complex eukaryotic proteins. Thanks to their increased reliability, computational design methods have been applied to improve therapeutics and enzymes for green chemistry and have generated vaccine antigens, antivirals and drug-delivery nano-vehicles. Moreover, the high success of design methods reflects an increased understanding of basic rules that govern the relationships among protein sequence, structure and function. However, de novo design is still limited mostly to α-helix bundles, restricting its potential to generate sophisticated enzymes and diverse protein and small-molecule binders. Designing complex protein structures is a challenging but necessary next step if we are to realize our objective of generating new-to-nature activities.

Citing Articles

Polyethylene Glycolylation of the Purified Basic Protein (Protamine) of Squid (): Structural Changes and Evaluation of Proliferative Effects on Fibroblast.

Li N, Xu J, Li Y, Elango J, Wu W Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(5).

PMID: 40076495 PMC: 11899872. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26051869.


Ancestral Sequence Reconstruction for Designing Biocatalysts and Investigating their Functional Mechanisms.

Prakinee K, Phaisan S, Kongjaroon S, Chaiyen P JACS Au. 2024; 4(12):4571-4591.

PMID: 39735918 PMC: 11672134. DOI: 10.1021/jacsau.4c00653.


ProteinReDiff: Complex-based ligand-binding proteins redesign by equivariant diffusion-based generative models.

Nguyen V, Nguyen N, Hy T Struct Dyn. 2024; 11(6):064102.

PMID: 39629167 PMC: 11614476. DOI: 10.1063/4.0000271.


Artificial intelligence-guided strategies for next-generation biological sequence design.

Zhang P, Wei L, Li J, Wang X Natl Sci Rev. 2024; 11(11):nwae343.

PMID: 39606146 PMC: 11601974. DOI: 10.1093/nsr/nwae343.


Potentiation of Catalase-Mediated Plant Thermotolerance by N-Terminal Attachment of Solubilizing/Thermostabilizing Fusion Partners.

Xie G, Huang Y, Hu D, Xia Y, Gong M, Zou Z Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(22).

PMID: 39596251 PMC: 11594932. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252212181.


References
1.
Abanades B, Wong W, Boyles F, Georges G, Bujotzek A, Deane C . ImmuneBuilder: Deep-Learning models for predicting the structures of immune proteins. Commun Biol. 2023; 6(1):575. PMC: 10227038. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-04927-7. View

2.
Brocchieri L, Karlin S . Protein length in eukaryotic and prokaryotic proteomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005; 33(10):3390-400. PMC: 1150220. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gki615. View

3.
Yang G, Anderson D, Baier F, Dohmen E, Hong N, Carr P . Higher-order epistasis shapes the fitness landscape of a xenobiotic-degrading enzyme. Nat Chem Biol. 2019; 15(11):1120-1128. DOI: 10.1038/s41589-019-0386-3. View

4.
Bednar D, Beerens K, Sebestova E, Bendl J, Khare S, Chaloupkova R . FireProt: Energy- and Evolution-Based Computational Design of Thermostable Multiple-Point Mutants. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015; 11(11):e1004556. PMC: 4631455. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004556. View

5.
Huang P, Boyken S, Baker D . The coming of age of de novo protein design. Nature. 2016; 537(7620):320-7. DOI: 10.1038/nature19946. View